These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7960994)
1. Integrated software tools for the evaluation of radiotherapy treatment plans. Drzymala RE; Holman MD; Yan D; Harms WB; Jain NL; Kahn MG; Emami B; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Nov; 30(4):909-19. PubMed ID: 7960994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MMCTP: a radiotherapy research environment for Monte Carlo and patient-specific treatment planning. Alexander A; Deblois F; Stroian G; Al-Yahya K; Heath E; Seuntjens J Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):N297-308. PubMed ID: 17664568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "SABER": A new software tool for radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation. Zhao B; Joiner MC; Orton CG; Burmeister J Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5586-92. PubMed ID: 21158270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose response explorer: an integrated open-source tool for exploring and modelling radiotherapy dose-volume outcome relationships. El Naqa I; Suneja G; Lindsay PE; Hope AJ; Alaly JR; Vicic M; Bradley JD; Apte A; Deasy JO Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5719-35. PubMed ID: 17068361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. Deasy JO; Blanco AI; Clark VH Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):979-85. PubMed ID: 12773007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interactively exploring optimized treatment plans. Rosen I; Liu HH; Childress N; Liao Z Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):570-82. PubMed ID: 15667980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A portable software tool for computing digitally reconstructed radiographs. Chaney EL; Thorn JS; Tracton G; Cullip T; Rosenman JG; Tepper JE Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 May; 32(2):491-7. PubMed ID: 7751190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Portable software tools for 3D radiation therapy planning. Jacky J; Kalet I; Chen J; Coggins J; Cousins S; Drzymala R; Harms W; Kahn M; Kromhout-Schiro S; Sherouse G Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Nov; 30(4):921-8. PubMed ID: 7960995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison. De Meerleer GO; Vakaet LA; De Gersem WR; De Wagter C; De Naeyer B; De Neve W Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):639-48. PubMed ID: 10837946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time 3D dose calculation and display: a tool for plan optimization. Matthews JW; Rosenberger FU; Bosch WR; Harms WB; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Aug; 36(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 8823271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo treatment planning for molecular targeted radiotherapy within the MINERVA system. Lehmann J; Hartmann Siantar C; Wessol DE; Wemple CA; Nigg D; Cogliati J; Daly T; Descalle MA; Flickinger T; Pletcher D; Denardo G Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):947-58. PubMed ID: 15798267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study. Wu Q; Manning M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Mohan R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 10656393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning study for patients with carcinoma of the lung. Graham MV; Matthews JW; Harms WB; Emami B; Glazer HS; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Jul; 29(5):1105-17. PubMed ID: 8083080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential clinical efficacy of intensity-modulated conformal therapy. Meeks SL; Buatti JM; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Mendenhall WM; Zlotecki RA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(2):483-95. PubMed ID: 9457839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective evaluation of 3-D radiation treatment plans: a decision-analytic tool incorporating treatment preferences of radiation oncologists. Jain NL; Kahn MG; Drzymala RE; Emami BE; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 May; 26(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 8491690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interface software for DOSXYZnrc Monte Carlo dose evaluation on a commercial radiation treatment planning system. Kunieda E; Deloar HM; Takagi S; Sato K; Kawase T; Saitoh H; Saito K; Sato O; Sorell G; Kubo A Radiat Med; 2007 Jul; 25(6):309-14. PubMed ID: 17634887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous optimization of sequential IMRT plans. Popple RA; Prellop PB; Spencer SA; De Los Santos JF; Duan J; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3257-66. PubMed ID: 16370415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dose-volume-based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans. Miften MM; Das SK; Su M; Marks LB J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):1-14. PubMed ID: 15738916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]