116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7961173)
21. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time.
Miller CA; Faulkner MJ; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):100-11. PubMed ID: 8647732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. IV. Effects of stimulus intensity.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 132(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 10392548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea.
Charlet de Sauvage R; Lima da Costa D; Erre JP; Aran JM
Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):119-34. PubMed ID: 9282894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acute study on the neuronal excitability of the cochlear nuclei of the guinea pig following electrical stimulation.
Liu X; McPhee G; Seldon HL; Clark GM
Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 9199522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Development of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response modules of REZ-I domestic cochlear implant device].
Ding X; Zhang R; Xu C; Fan W; Zhang D
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 49(12):1013-6. PubMed ID: 25623869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in peripherally myelin-deficient mice.
Zhou R; Abbas PJ; Assouline JG
Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 8576009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.
Hall RD
Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):123-36. PubMed ID: 2345111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with absence of cochlear modiolus receiving cochlear implantation].
Wang ZX; Wang LE; Gong SS; Han SG; Gao FQ
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 31(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29871199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location.
Leake PA; Snyder RL; Hradek GT; Rebscher SJ
Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 64(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 1490906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
Shepherd RK; Javel E
Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
