These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7962016)

  • 1. EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model.
    Cholewicki J; McGill SM
    J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1287-9. PubMed ID: 7962016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach.
    Cholewicki J; McGill SM; Norman RW
    J Biomech; 1995 Mar; 28(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 7730390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An improved multi-joint EMG-assisted optimization approach to estimate joint and muscle forces in a musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine.
    Gagnon D; Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2011 May; 44(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 21439569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of trunk muscle forces, spinal loads and stability estimated by one stability- and three EMG-assisted optimization approaches.
    Mohammadi Y; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):792-800. PubMed ID: 26117333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A hybrid method including optimization and force-EMG relationship for predicting muscle force].
    Zhang X; Ye M; Zhang L; Nie W; Wang C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 26(6):1260-3. PubMed ID: 20095482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization.
    Sartori M; Farina D; Lloyd DG
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(15):3613-21. PubMed ID: 25458151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of EMG processing on biomechanical models of muscle joint systems: sensitivity of trunk muscle moments, spinal forces, and stability.
    Staudenmann D; Potvin JR; Kingma I; Stegeman DF; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(4):900-9. PubMed ID: 16765965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Describing the active region boundary of EMG-assisted biomechanical models of the low back.
    Ning X; Jin S; Mirka GA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jun; 27(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 22169592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of electromyography-assisted modelling in estimating musculotendon forces during gait in children with cerebral palsy.
    Veerkamp K; Schallig W; Harlaar J; Pizzolato C; Carty CP; Lloyd DG; van der Krogt MM
    J Biomech; 2019 Jul; 92():45-53. PubMed ID: 31153626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the effect of co-contraction in optimization models.
    Hughes RE; Bean JC; Chaffin DB
    J Biomech; 1995 Jul; 28(7):875-8. PubMed ID: 7657686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A biomechanical comparison between expert and novice manual materials handlers using a multi-joint EMG-assisted optimization musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2938-2945. PubMed ID: 27469898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The redundant nature of locomotor optimization laws.
    Collins JJ
    J Biomech; 1995 Mar; 28(3):251-67. PubMed ID: 7730385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-step EMG-and-optimization process to estimate muscle force during dynamic movement.
    Amarantini D; Rao G; Berton E
    J Biomech; 2010 Jun; 43(9):1827-30. PubMed ID: 20206935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach.
    Heintz S; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17071088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A proprioception based regulation model to estimate the trunk muscle forces.
    Pomero V; Lavaste F; Imbert G; Skalli W
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Dec; 7(6):331-8. PubMed ID: 15621653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Predictions Between an EMG-Assisted Approach and Two Optimization-Driven Approaches for Lumbar Spine Loading During Walking With Backpack Loads.
    Li SSW; Chow DHK
    Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):565-577. PubMed ID: 31189071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.