These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7962358)
1. Head-injured patients and control group: implicit versus explicit measures of frequency of occurrence. Vakil E; Biederman Y; Liran G; Groswasser Z; Aberbuch S J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Aug; 16(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 7962358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating evidence for automaticity in frequency of occurrence judgments: a bias for bias? Tweedy JR; Vakil E J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1988 Oct; 10(5):664-74. PubMed ID: 3225318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between three memory tests: cued recall, priming and saving closed-head injured patients and controls. Vakil E; Oded Y J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Apr; 25(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 12754683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociation of frequency and recency processing from list recall after severe closed head injury in children and adolescents. Levin HS; Song J; Scheibel RS; Fletcher JM; Harward HN; Chapman SB J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 22(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10649541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning people's names following severe closed-head injury. Milders M J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Apr; 20(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 9777478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic temporal order judgment: the effect of intentionality of retrieval on closed-head-injured patients. Vakil E; Blachstein H; Hoofien D J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Mar; 13(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 1864916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Word recall versus reading speed: evidence of preserved priming in head-injured patients. Vakil E; Jaffe R; Eluze S; Groswasser Z; Aberbuch S Brain Cogn; 1996 Jun; 31(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 8790936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Declarative and nondeclarative sequence learning tasks: closed-head injured patients versus control participants. Vakil E; Gordon Y; Birnstok S; Aberbuch S; Groswasser Z J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Apr; 23(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 11309674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implicit, explicit, and semantic memory functions in Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease. Randolph C J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):479-94. PubMed ID: 1833416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of level of processing on perceptual and conceptual priming: control versus closed-head-injured patients. Vakil E; Sigal J J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Jul; 3(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 9260442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients]. Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impaired production priming and intact identification priming in Alzheimer's disease. Fleischman DA; Monti LA; Dwornik LM; Moro TT; Bennett DA; Gabrieli JD J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Nov; 7(7):785-94. PubMed ID: 11771621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Building episodic connections: changes in episodic priming with age and dementia. Faust ME; Balota DA; Spieler DH Neuropsychology; 2001 Oct; 15(4):626-37. PubMed ID: 11761052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval. Clarke AJ; Butler LT Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]