These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7962807)

  • 1. Magnetization transfer contrast imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
    Yoshioka H; Nishimura H; Masuda T; Nakajima K; Onaya H; Itai Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(6):947-53. PubMed ID: 7962807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
    Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine.
    Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical spine MR imaging using multislice gradient echo imaging: comparison with cardiac gated spin echo.
    Kulkarni MV; Narayana PA; McArdle CB; Yeakley JW; Campagna NF; Wehrli FW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(5):517-25. PubMed ID: 3226236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D MRI of the cervical spine: low flip angle FISP vs. Gd-DTPA TurboFLASH in degenerative disk disease.
    Ross JS; Ruggieri PM; Glicklich M; Obuchowski N; Dillinger J; Masaryk TJ; Qu Y; Modic MT
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 8419435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part I. General considerations and disk disease.
    Enzmann DR; Rubin JB
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):467-72. PubMed ID: 3336722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of three-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and steady-state gradient echo sequences in axial MRI examination of the cervical spine].
    Mahmutyazicioğlu K; Ozdemir H; Savranlar A; Ozer T; Erdem O; Erdem Z; Gündoğdu S
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 14730951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical spondylosis: three-dimensional gradient-echo MR with magnetization transfer.
    Melhem ER; Benson ML; Beauchamp NJ; Lee RR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Apr; 17(4):705-11. PubMed ID: 8730191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the lumbar spine: comparison with spin-echo technique.
    Watanabe AT; Teitelbaum GP; Lufkin RB; Tsuruda JS; Jinkins JR; Bradley WG
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 2335609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments, and spinal cord before and after closed traction reduction of cervical spine dislocations.
    Vaccaro AR; Falatyn SP; Flanders AE; Balderston RA; Northrup BE; Cotler JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(12):1210-7. PubMed ID: 10382247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of fat saturation technique for T2-weighted MR imaging of the spine.
    Mirowitz SA; Reinus WR; Hammerman AM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 12(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 8057764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part II. Spinal cord disease.
    Enzmann DR; Rubin JB
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 3336723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low flip angle gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 tesla.
    Holtås S; Ståhlberg F; Nilsson H; Larsson EM; Ericsson A
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 2775593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BLADE sequences in transverse T2-weighted MR imaging of the cervical spine. Cut-off for Artefacts?
    Finkenzeller T; Wendl CM; Lenhart S; Stroszczynski C; Schuierer G; Fellner C
    Rofo; 2015 Feb; 187(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 25243527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of gradient-recalled-echo and T2-weighted spin-echo pulse sequences in intramedullary spinal lesions.
    Katz BH; Quencer RM; Hinks RS
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1989; 10(4):815-22. PubMed ID: 2505509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gradient echo imaging of the lumbar spine.
    Wasenko JJ; Rosenbaum AE; Yu SF; Falen SW; Collins CS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1994; 18(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 7954312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BLADE in sagittal T2-weighted MR imaging of the cervical spine.
    Fellner C; Menzel C; Fellner FA; Ginthoer C; Zorger N; Schreyer A; Jung EM; Feuerbach S; Finkenzeller T
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Apr; 31(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 19942708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical spondylosis: contrast-enhanced magnetization transfer prepulsed 3D turbo field echo MR imaging.
    Melhem ER; Bert RJ; Faddoul SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Mar; 11(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 10739561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of 2-D and 3-D FSE imaging in MR of the cervical spine.
    Swainson CJ; Hutchinson CE; Watson Y
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Mar; 52(3):194-7. PubMed ID: 9091253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BLADE Sequences in Transverse T2-weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine. Cut-off for Artefacts?
    Finkenzeller T; Wendl CM; Lenhart S; Stroszczynski C; Schuierer G; Fellner C
    Rofo; 2015 May; 36(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 25912327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.