These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7962904)

  • 1. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    J Dent; 1994 Oct; 22(5):265-72. PubMed ID: 7962904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 8990682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements.
    Michelini FS; Belser UC; Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 7575974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):670-4. PubMed ID: 12901993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements.
    van Dijken JW; Ormin A; Olofsson AL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Nov; 82(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 10559724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. A two year follow-up study.
    Höglund C; van Dijken J; Olofsson AL
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(4):169-71. PubMed ID: 1455328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement.
    Aberg CH; van Dijken JW; Olofsson AL
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1994 Jun; 52(3):140-9. PubMed ID: 8091960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements.
    Abdalla AI; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 11764831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Inokoshi S; Willems G; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):329-38. PubMed ID: 8530722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up.
    van Dijken JW; Höglund-Aberg C; Olofsson AL
    J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 9594473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Dec; 1(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9555215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.
    Ferrari M; Dagostin A; Fabianelli A
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 12686290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
    Bott B; Hannig M
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
    Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.