These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7963007)

  • 1. The application of frequency and time domain kurtosis to the assessment of hazardous noise exposures.
    Lei SF; Ahroon WA; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1435-44. PubMed ID: 7963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of the amplitude distribution of equal energy exposures on noise-induced hearing loss: the kurtosis metric.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):386-95. PubMed ID: 12880050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of the kurtosis statistic in evaluating complex noise exposures for the protection of hearing.
    Davis RI; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 19657275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiometric and histological differences between the effects of continuous and impulsive noise exposures.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD; Lei SF; Davis RI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2088-95. PubMed ID: 8473621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The kurtosis metric as an adjunct to energy in the prediction of trauma from continuous, nonGaussian noise exposures.
    Qiu W; Hamernik RP; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3901-6. PubMed ID: 17225417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of a kurtosis metric in estimating the hazard to hearing of complex industrial noise exposures.
    Qiu W; Hamernik RP; Davis RI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2856-66. PubMed ID: 23654391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear toughening, protection, and potentiation of noise-induced trauma by non-Gaussian noise.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):969-76. PubMed ID: 12597190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy-independent factors influencing noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla model.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3163-8. PubMed ID: 11785817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kurtosis corrected sound pressure level as a noise metric for risk assessment of occupational noises.
    Goley GS; Song WJ; Kim JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1475-81. PubMed ID: 21428511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise.
    Zhao YM; Qiu W; Zeng L; Chen SS; Cheng XR; Davis RI; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 20588120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2245-54. PubMed ID: 17902860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the equal energy rule applicable to impact noise?
    Henderson D; Salvi RJ; Hamernik RP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():71-82. PubMed ID: 6962515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The energy spectrum of an impulse: its relation to hearing loss.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 1880289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of resistance to hearing loss from high frequency noise.
    Subramaniam M; Campo P; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 1991 Nov; 56(1-2):65-8. PubMed ID: 1769925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure.
    Dunn DE; Davis RR; Merry CJ; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1979-85. PubMed ID: 1669963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of low-frequency "conditioning" on hearing loss from high-frequency exposure.
    Subramaniam M; Henderson D; Spongr V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):952-6. PubMed ID: 8445129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of industrial noise of higher spectrum on the workers’ auditory perception abilities.
    Mihailović D; Đurić N; Kovačević I; Mihailović Đ
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(11):1030-7. PubMed ID: 29328642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of tuning curve variables and threshold measures in the estimation of sensory cell loss.
    Ahroon WA; Davis RI; Hamernik RP
    Audiology; 1993; 32(4):244-59. PubMed ID: 8343081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach for recording distortion product oto-acoustic emissions.
    Rasmussen AN; Osterhammel PA
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 1488608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.