These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of forward masking on intensity discrimination, frequency discrimination, and the detection of tones in noise. Carlyon RP; Beveridge HA J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2886-95. PubMed ID: 8315152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The mid-difference hump in forward-masked intensity discrimination. Oberfeld D J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1571-81. PubMed ID: 18345845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Loudness enhancement and intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking. Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1024-30. PubMed ID: 8759955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones. Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD; Meddis R J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):978-90. PubMed ID: 12942977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal integration of loudness under partial masking. Florentine M; Buus S; Robinson M J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):999-1007. PubMed ID: 9714919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loudness changes induced by a proximal sound: loudness enhancement, loudness recalibration, or both? Oberfeld D J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2137-48. PubMed ID: 17471728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones. Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The mid-level hump at 2 kHz. Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):642-53. PubMed ID: 12186044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones. Schairer KS; Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1560-73. PubMed ID: 12656391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot. Hicks ML; Bacon SP J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral and level effects in noise-on-tone suppression. Sidwell A J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1078-84. PubMed ID: 3571724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of a low-frequency masker on loudness. Henning GB; Zwicker E Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):17-23. PubMed ID: 2228794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency discrimination in forward and backward masking. Turner CW; Zeng FG; Relkin EM; Horwitz AR J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3102-8. PubMed ID: 1474225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural mechanisms of tone-on-tone masking: patterns of discharge rate and discharge synchrony related to rates of spontaneous discharge in the chinchilla auditory nerve. Sinex DG; Havey DC J Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 56(6):1763-80. PubMed ID: 3806187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise. Greenwood DD Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones. Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forward masking of dynamic acoustic intensity: effects of intensity region and end-level. Olsen KN; Stevens CJ Perception; 2012; 41(5):594-605. PubMed ID: 23025162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]