132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7963242)
1. The local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) production by draining lymph node cells.
Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Ramdin LS; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1994; 14(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 7963242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon-gamma and interleukin 12.
Dearman RJ; Hilton J; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 10362264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
Maurer T; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals.
Ulrich P; Streich J; Suter W
Arch Toxicol; 2001 Feb; 74(12):733-44. PubMed ID: 11305775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study.
Kimber I; Weisenberger C
Arch Toxicol; 1989; 63(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 2788401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ
Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure.
De Jong WH; Arts JH; De Klerk A; Schijf MA; Ezendam J; Kuper CF; Van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Basketter DA
Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 7974502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial.
Loveless SE; Ladics GS; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; House RV; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1996 Apr; 108(1-2):141-52. PubMed ID: 8644112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interleukin 6 production in vitro: An alternative read-out for the local lymph node assay.
Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Debicki RJ; Ramdin LS; Kimber I
Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Aug; 8(4):711-3. PubMed ID: 20692993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The kinetics of cytokine production by draining lymph node cells following primary exposure of mice to chemical allergens.
Hope JC; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Hopkins SJ
Immunology; 1994 Oct; 83(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 7835943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interleukin-6 production by draining lymph node cells following primary contact sensitisation of mice: relationship to the proliferative response.
Hope JC; Dearman RJ; Debicki RJ; Kimber I; Hopkins SJ
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 1994; 103(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8130651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. B cell increases and ex vivo IL-2 production as secondary endpoints for the detection of sensitizers in non-radioisotopic local lymph node assay using flow cytometry.
Jung KM; Jang WH; Lee YK; Yum YN; Sohn S; Kim BH; Chung JH; Park YH; Lim KM
Toxicol Lett; 2012 Mar; 209(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 22245253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles.
Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A
Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytokine fingerprinting: characterization of chemical allergens.
Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10525438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
