345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7964357)
21. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance indicators evaluation of the population-based breast cancer screening programme in Northern Portugal using the European Guidelines.
Bento MJ; Gonçalves G; Aguiar A; Castro C; Veloso V; Rodrigues V
Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 39(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 26315486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Need for open access non-screening mammography in a hospital with a specialist breast clinic service.
Curtin JJ; Sampson MA
BMJ; 1992 Feb; 304(6826):549-51. PubMed ID: 1559063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of lesions detected at mammographic screening: performance at first or repeat screening in the Florence programme.
Ciatto S; Del Turco MR; Giorgi D; Morrone D; Catarzi S; Ambrogetti D; Paci E; Zappa M
J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 8790515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Cervical and breast cancer screening among immigrant women resident in Italy].
Francovich L; Di Napoli A; Giorgi Rossi P; Gargiulo L; Giordani B; Petrelli A
Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(3-4 (Suppl 1)):18-25. PubMed ID: 28929723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Early indicators of efficacy of breast cancer screening programmes. Results of the Florence District Programme.
Paci E; Ciatto S; Buiatti E; Cecchini S; Palli D; Rosselli del Turco M
Int J Cancer; 1990 Aug; 46(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 2384270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK.
Horton Taylor D; McPherson K; Parbhoo S; Perry N
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Feb; 50(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8762359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An estimate of overdiagnosis 15 years after the start of mammographic screening in Florence.
Puliti D; Zappa M; Miccinesi G; Falini P; Crocetti E; Paci E
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3166-71. PubMed ID: 19879130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Integrating self-referral for mammography into organised screening: results from an Italian experience.
Bucchi L; Falcini F; Baraldi GP; Bondi A; Bonsanto R; Bravetti P; Desiderio F; de Bianchi PS
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 14561265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammography screening in Italy: 2007 survey.
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3 Suppl 2):13-28. PubMed ID: 19776484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance data of screening mammography at a dedicated breast health centre.
Apffelstaedt JP; Steenkamp V; Baatjes K
S Afr Med J; 2008 Dec; 98(12):950-3. PubMed ID: 19374072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
