These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7964527)

  • 1. Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations.
    Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Oct; 20(5):1015-36. PubMed ID: 7964527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?
    Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitation and inhibition caused by the orienting of attention in propositional reasoning tasks.
    Cherubini P; Mazzocco A; Minelli S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1496-523. PubMed ID: 17853220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting.
    Scolari M; Awh E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385. PubMed ID: 30684205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
    Yuan L; Uttal D; Franconeri S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163141. PubMed ID: 27695104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex related biases for attending to object color versus object position are reflected in reaction time and accuracy.
    McGivern RF; Mosso M; Freudenberg A; Handa RJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210272. PubMed ID: 30625223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of spatial congruency on saccade and visual discrimination performance in a dual-task paradigm.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():100-11. PubMed ID: 25449339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Transient structures": the effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches.
    Carrasco M; Ponte D; Rechea C; Sampedro MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Oct; 60(7):1243-58. PubMed ID: 9821785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exogenous attention influences visual short-term memory in infants.
    Ross-Sheehy S; Oakes LM; Luck SJ
    Dev Sci; 2011 May; 14(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 21477189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Vision Res; 2001 Mar; 41(5):611-24. PubMed ID: 11226506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractors slow information accumulation in simple feature search.
    Kent C; Howard CJ; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22251834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exogenous spatial precuing reliably modulates object processing but not object substitution masking.
    Pilling M; Gellatly A; Argyropoulos Y; Skarratt P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1560-76. PubMed ID: 24811038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention.
    Greenberg AS; Rosen M; Cutrone E; Behrmann M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1544-57. PubMed ID: 25832192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of attention: selection is transient.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27661. PubMed ID: 22125619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Searching in dynamic displays: effects of configural predictability and spatiotemporal continuity.
    Alvarez GA; Konkle T; Oliva A
    J Vis; 2007 Dec; 7(14):12.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual load modulates object-based attention.
    Ho MC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1661-9. PubMed ID: 19968427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting semantics: conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention.
    Goodhew SC; Kendall W; Ferber S; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1577-89. PubMed ID: 24824982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.