These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7964527)

  • 21. How do magnitude and frequency of monetary reward guide visual search?
    Won BY; Leber AB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1221-31. PubMed ID: 27270595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selective impairment of spatial attention during visual search in Alzheimer's disease.
    Parasuraman R; Greenwood PM; Alexander GE
    Neuroreport; 1995 Oct; 6(14):1861-4. PubMed ID: 8547585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reprint of: The effects of distractors and spatial precues on covert visual search in macaque. Vision Research, 76, pp. 43-9.
    Lee BT; McPeek RM
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():73-9. PubMed ID: 23685163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual attention and the apprehension of spatial relations: the case of depth.
    Moore CM; Elsinger CL; Lleras A
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 11436732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relationship between spatial pooling and attention in saccadic and perceptual tasks.
    Cohen EH; Schnitzer BS; Gersch TM; Singh M; Kowler E
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(14):1907-23. PubMed ID: 17499833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Functional consequences of compositional spatial representations elicited during conceptual control of visual spatial attention.
    Sztybel P; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jul; 146(7):1009-1025. PubMed ID: 28493756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
    Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of emotional and non-emotional cues on visual search in neglect patients: evidence for distinct sources of attentional guidance.
    Lucas N; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1401-14. PubMed ID: 18289616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rebalancing Spatial Attention: Endogenous Orienting May Partially Overcome the Left Visual Field Bias in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Hasan GS; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 29(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 27626225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions.
    Nako R; Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1571-86. PubMed ID: 27213833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of distractors in multiple object tracking are modulated by the similarity of distractor and target features.
    Feria CS
    Perception; 2012; 41(3):287-304. PubMed ID: 22808583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High spatial validity is not sufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention.
    Pauszek JR; Gibson BS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2110-23. PubMed ID: 27044388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Age similarities in the inertial properties of attention.
    Gottlob LR; Madden DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):740-55. PubMed ID: 10370340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attention-free integration of spatial frequency-based information in natural scenes.
    Kihara K; Takeda Y
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 65():38-44. PubMed ID: 22733011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.
    Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(7):1073-86. PubMed ID: 10775717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention.
    Logan GD
    Cogn Psychol; 1995 Apr; 28(2):103-74. PubMed ID: 7736720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.