These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7964533)

  • 1. Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: implications for models of adaptation.
    Cunningham HA; Welch RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Oct; 20(5):987-99. PubMed ID: 7964533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic.
    Knapen T; Rolfs M; Cavanagh P
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):16.1-7. PubMed ID: 19757894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Switching between visuomotor mappings: learning absolute mappings or relative shifts.
    van Dam LC; Hawellek DJ; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23447680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye Tracking of Occluded Self-Moved Targets: Role of Haptic Feedback and Hand-Target Dynamics.
    Danion F; Mathew J; Flanagan JR
    eNeuro; 2017; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 28680964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation.
    Held R; Dichigans J; Bauer J
    Vision Res; 1975 Mar; 15(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 1136151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological Form is Sufficient to Create a Biological Motion Sex Aftereffect.
    Hiris E; Mirenzi A; Janis K
    Perception; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1115-36. PubMed ID: 27251167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye movements during motion after-effect.
    Seidman SH; Leigh RJ; Thomas CW
    Vision Res; 1992 Jan; 32(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 1502802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues.
    Schofield AJ; Ledgeway T; Hutchinson CV
    J Vis; 2007 Jun; 7(8):1. PubMed ID: 17685808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The visual perception of motion.
    Snowden RJ; Freeman TC
    Curr Biol; 2004 Oct; 14(19):R828-31. PubMed ID: 15458658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decay of prism aftereffects under passive and active conditions.
    Fernández-Ruiz J; Díaz R; Aguilar C; Hall-Haro C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 15130593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The aftereffect to relative motion does not show interocular transfer.
    Symons LA; Pearson PM; Timney B
    Perception; 1996; 25(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 8888298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The extra-retinal motion aftereffect.
    Freeman TC; Sumnall JH; Snowden RJ
    J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):771-9. PubMed ID: 14765960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative errors can cue absolute visuomotor mappings.
    van Dam LC; Ernst MO
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3367-77. PubMed ID: 26280315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human sensorimotor cortex represents conflicting visuomotor mappings.
    Ogawa K; Imamizu H
    J Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 33(15):6412-22. PubMed ID: 23575839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Storage of an oculomotor motion aftereffect.
    Watamaniuk SN; Heinen SJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 17239421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interocular transfer of a rotational motion aftereffect as a function of eccentricity.
    Grove PM; Ashida H; Kaneko H; Ono H
    Perception; 2008; 37(8):1152-9. PubMed ID: 18853552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereodeficient subjects show substantial differences in interocular transfer of two motion adaptation aftereffects.
    McColl SL; Mitchell DE
    Vision Res; 1998 Jun; 38(12):1889-900. PubMed ID: 9797965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motion perception. Switching off an after-effect.
    Braddick O
    Nature; 1990 Mar; 344(6261):22. PubMed ID: 2304553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of background motion on the motion aftereffect.
    Smith AT; Musselwhite MJ; Hammond P
    Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 6506472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context-dependent arm pointing adaptation.
    Seidler RD; Bloomberg JJ; Stelmach GE
    Behav Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 119(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 11165331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.