140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7964774)
1. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal.
Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS
J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apparent changes in the alignment of the femoral component in hip arthroplasties associated with limb positioning.
Goodman S; Rubenstein J; Schatzker J; Kadish L; Fornasier V
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Aug; (221):242-5. PubMed ID: 3608305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rotation affects apparent radiographic positioning of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty.
Albert TJ; Sharkey PF; Chao W; Hume EL; Rothman RH
J Arthroplasty; 1991; 6 Suppl():S67-71. PubMed ID: 1774573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal.
Laine HJ; Lehto MU; Moilanen T
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10654468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Radiologic changes of anatomic parameters of the proximal femur as a function of its position in rotation].
Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; Heegaard JH
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1989; 75(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 2781066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.
Noble PC; Box GG; Kamaric E; Fink MJ; Alexander JW; Tullos HS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jul; (316):31-44. PubMed ID: 7634721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximal femoral medullary canal diameters in Indians: correlation between anatomic, radiographic, and computed tomographic measurements.
Sen RK; Tripathy SK; Kumar R; Kumar A; Dhatt S; Dhillon MS; Nagi ON; Gulati M
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Aug; 18(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 20808010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Roentgenographic changes in proximal femoral dimensions due to hip rotation.
Bell AL; Brand RA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Mar; (240):194-9. PubMed ID: 2917433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal.
Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A
Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.
Zhang Q; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Huddleston JI
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 26245165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties.
Radtke K; Becher C; Noll Y; Ostermeier S
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 19898854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the canal flare index a reliable means of estimation of canal shape? Measurement of proximal femoral geometry by use of 3D models of the femur.
Tawada K; Iguchi H; Tanaka N; Watanabe N; Murakami S; Hasegawa S; Otsuka T
J Orthop Sci; 2015 May; 20(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 25740729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Restoration of femoral offset during hip replacement. A radiographic cadaver study.
Lindgren JU; Rysavy J
Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Aug; 63(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 1529690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative templating of femoral components on plain X-rays. Rotational evaluation with synthetic X-rays on ORTHODOC.
Hananouchi T; Sugano N; Nakamura N; Nishii T; Miki H; Yamamura M; Yoshikawa H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Jul; 127(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 17522880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Failure of intraoperatively customized non-porous femoral components inserted without cement in total hip arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Mallory TH; Eberle RW; Mitchell MB; Lefkowitz MS; Williams JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Dec; 77(12):1836-44. PubMed ID: 8550651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cortical step sign as a tool for assessing and correcting rotational deformity in femoral shaft fractures.
Langer JS; Gardner MJ; Ricci WM
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Feb; 24(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 20101131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Osteometry of the femora in Turkish individuals: a morphometric study in 114 cadaveric femora as an anatomic basis of femoral component design].
Atilla B; Oznur A; Cağlar O; Tokgözoğlu M; Alpaslan M
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17483639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.
Lecerf G; Fessy MH; Philippot R; Massin P; Giraud F; Flecher X; Girard J; Mertl P; Marchetti E; Stindel E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 19423418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a novel method to calculate cementless femoral stem level on craniocaudal projection radiographs.
Brand KJ; Beale BS; Hudson CC
Vet Surg; 2021 Nov; 50(8):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 34545581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological aspects in preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Linclau L; Dokter G; Peene P
Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 8372651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
