These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. [Current viewpoints in the anti-D prevention of rhesus alloimmunization in the pregnant woman and of hemolytic disease of the newborn infant (a review of the literature)]. Spasova K; Vŭlcheva B Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1986; 25(3):84-90. PubMed ID: 3019168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On the immunologic basis of Rh immune globulin (anti-D) prophylaxis. Kumpel BM Transfusion; 2006 Sep; 46(9):1652-6. PubMed ID: 16965599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. Services should be centralised for pregnancies affected by RhD haemolytic disease. Craig JS; McClure BG; Tubman TR BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7144):1611. PubMed ID: 9616034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. van Dijk B BMJ; 1997 Dec; 315(7121):1480-1. PubMed ID: 9420481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The prevention and management of haemolytic disease of the newborn. Contreras M; de Silva M J R Soc Med; 1994 May; 87(5):256-8. PubMed ID: 8207718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The history of rhesus prophylaxis with anti-D. Wegmann A; Glück R Eur J Pediatr; 1996 Oct; 155(10):835-8. PubMed ID: 8891551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preventing rhesus D haemolytic disease of the newborn by giving anti-D immunoglobulin: are the guidelines being adequately followed? Harding K Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):869-70. PubMed ID: 9236664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of NICE recommendation for a policy of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis: a survey of UK maternity units. Harkness M; Freer Y; Prescott RJ; Warner P Transfus Med; 2008 Oct; 18(5):292-5. PubMed ID: 18937736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. Revised guidelines advocate two doses of anti-D immunoglobulin for antenatal prophylaxis. Lee D BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7144):1611. PubMed ID: 9596614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Haemolytic disease of the newborn--the changing scene. Tovey LA Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Sep; 93(9):960-6. PubMed ID: 3094573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Management of Rhesus isoimmunization. Viewpoint of the obstetrician]. Langer B Arch Pediatr; 1998 Nov; 5(11):1269-73. PubMed ID: 9853068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Haemolytic disease of the newborn: the new NICE guidelines. Thompson J J Fam Health Care; 2002; 12(5):133-6. PubMed ID: 12449064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Is it advisable to produce anti-Rh0(D) immunoglobulin for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn? (apropos the article by A. A. Mikhaĭlova and N. Ia. Klimova)]. Olovnikova NI; Chertkov IL Gematol Transfuziol; 1993 Mar; 38(3):38-40. PubMed ID: 8020736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rh(D) haemolytic disease of the newborn: the changing scene. Urbaniak SJ Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):4-6. PubMed ID: 2990630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]