These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7966868)

  • 1. The relationship between malpractice claims history and subsequent obstetric care.
    Entman SS; Glass CA; Hickson GB; Githens PB; Whetten-Goldstein K; Sloan FA
    JAMA; 1994 Nov 23-30; 272(20):1588-91. PubMed ID: 7966868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care.
    Hickson GB; Clayton EW; Entman SS; Miller CS; Githens PB; Whetten-Goldstein K; Sloan FA
    JAMA; 1994 Nov 23-30; 272(20):1583-7. PubMed ID: 7966867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.
    AlDakhil LO
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 May; 40():8-11. PubMed ID: 26947435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between physicians' malpractice claims history and later claims. Does the past predict the future?
    Bovbjerg RR; Petronis KR
    JAMA; 1994 Nov; 272(18):1421-6. PubMed ID: 7933423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. II. Is targeting effective?
    Rolph JE; Kravitz RL; McGuigan K
    JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2093-7. PubMed ID: 1920697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do physicians stop practicing obstetrics? The impact of malpractice claims.
    Rosenblatt RA; Weitkamp G; Lloyd M; Schafer B; Winterscheid LC; Hart LG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 76(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 2371029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties.
    Kravitz RL; Rolph JE; McGuigan K
    JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2087-92. PubMed ID: 1920696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced medicolegal risk by compliance with obstetric clinical pathways: a case--control study.
    Ransom SB; Studdert DM; Dombrowski MP; Mello MM; Brennan TA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):751-5. PubMed ID: 12681881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the obstetric malpractice claims filed by Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients.
    Baldwin LM; Greer T; Wu R; Hart G; Lloyd M; Rosenblatt RA
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 1462796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practice patterns to decrease the risk of a malpractice suit.
    Williams DG
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 51(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 18981792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of physicians with obstetric malpractice claims experience.
    Baldwin LM; Larson EH; Hart LG; Greer T; Lloyd M; Rosenblatt RA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 78(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 1945206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis.
    Grant D; McInnes MM
    Inquiry; 2004; 41(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 15449432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.
    Localio AR; Lawthers AG; Bengtson JM; Hebert LE; Weaver SL; Brennan TA; Landis JR
    JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 8418343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers.
    Schiff GD; Puopolo AL; Huben-Kearney A; Yu W; Keohane C; McDonough P; Ellis BR; Bates DW; Biondolillo M
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Dec 9-23; 173(22):2063-8. PubMed ID: 24081145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of closed obstetric malpractice claims.
    Rosenblatt RA; Hurst A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Nov; 74(5):710-4. PubMed ID: 2812646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of obstetric malpractice closed claims: profile of event.
    Julian TM; Brooker DC; Butler JC; Joseph MS; Ogburn PL; Williams PP; Anderson ML; Shepard AC; Preisler WC; Capell ML
    Am J Perinatol; 1985 Oct; 2(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 4052185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the threat of medical malpractice litigation and other factors on birth outcomes.
    Sloan FA; Whetten-Goldstein K; Githens PB; Entman SS
    Med Care; 1995 Jul; 33(7):700-14. PubMed ID: 7596209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between malpractice claims and medical care quality.
    Tsai WC; Kung PT; Chiang YJ
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2004; 17(7):394-400. PubMed ID: 15552395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice in Louisiana: incidence and impact.
    Begneaud WP
    J La State Med Soc; 1989 Sep; 141(9):27-33. PubMed ID: 2794746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paid malpractice claims for adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings.
    Bishop TF; Ryan AM; Casalino LP
    JAMA; 2011 Jun; 305(23):2427-31. PubMed ID: 21673294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.