These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7968547)
1. An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Rohrer D; Wixted JT Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):511-24. PubMed ID: 7968547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the relative and absolute strength of a memory trace. Rohrer D Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):188-201. PubMed ID: 8881322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrieval from semantic memory and its implications for Alzheimer's disease. Rohrer D; Wixted JT; Salmon DP; Butters N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1127-39. PubMed ID: 8744958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions. Jang Y; Lee H Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):792-815. PubMed ID: 30737728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of encoding manipulations on the dynamics of free recall. Unsworth N Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 25030080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions. Roelofs A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):303-23. PubMed ID: 18473661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency. Miller AL; Unsworth N Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors that influence search termination decisions in free recall: an examination of response type and confidence. Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 21621178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence for noisy contextual search: examining the dynamics of list-before-last recall. Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA Memory; 2012; 20(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 22111709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account. Finlay F; Hitch GJ; Meudell PR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 11185782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is scanning in probed order recall articulatory? Farrell S; Lelièvre A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1843-58. PubMed ID: 19180362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Failure to recall. Laming D Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):157-86. PubMed ID: 19159152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. State-dependent effects of alcohol on explicit memory: the role of semantic associations. Weissenborn R; Duka T Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Mar; 149(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 10789889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The recall of missing items. Murdock B; Smith D Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):380-8. PubMed ID: 16156174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions. Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall. Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):312-24. PubMed ID: 21928932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression]. Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]