These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7968647)

  • 1. Five gynecologic diagnoses associated with hysterectomy--trends in incidence of hospitalizations in Finland, 1971-1986.
    Luoto R; Rutanen EM; Kaprio J
    Maturitas; 1994 Aug; 19(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 7968647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decreasing trend and changing indications of hysterectomy in Finland.
    Hakkarainen J; Nevala A; Tomás E; Nieminen K; Malila N; Pitkäniemi J; Auranen A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Sep; 100(9):1722-1729. PubMed ID: 33797081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence, causes and surgical methods for hysterectomy in Finland, 1987-1989.
    Luoto R; Kaprio J; Keskimäki I; Pohjanlahti JP; Rutanen EM
    Int J Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 23(2):348-58. PubMed ID: 8082962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987-1995--a register based analysis.
    Vuorma S; Teperi J; Hurskainen R; Keskimäki I; Kujansuu E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):770-6. PubMed ID: 9740527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in hospitalizations for abnormal uterine bleeding in the United States: 1980-1992.
    Thompson BL; Ponce de León R; Kieke B; Velebil P; Wingo PA
    J Womens Health; 1997 Feb; 6(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 9065376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inpatient hospitalization for gynecologic disorders in the United States.
    Whiteman MK; Kuklina E; Jamieson DJ; Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):541.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20132921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recent estimates of the incidence of hysterectomy in New South Wales and trends over the past 30 years.
    Yusuf F; Leeder S; Wilson A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Aug; 56(4):420-5. PubMed ID: 27297684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elective hysterectomy--trends at Angthong Hospital.
    Wongsa P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Jul; 77(7):384-7. PubMed ID: 7876758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysterectomy rates for benign conditions are declining in Lombardy, Italy: 1996-2010.
    Parazzini F; Ricci E; Bulfoni G; Cipriani S; Chiaffarino F; Malvezzi M; Frigerio L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():107-13. PubMed ID: 24809987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.
    Morgan DM; Kamdar NS; Swenson CW; Kobernik EK; Sammarco AG; Nallamothu B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):425.e1-425.e18. PubMed ID: 29288067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The descriptive epidemiology of hysterectomy, Province of Quebec, 1981-1988.
    Allard P; Rochette L
    Ann Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 1669534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy in Reproductive Age: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital.
    Shahid R; Abbas H; Mumtaz S; Perveen F; Bari MF; Raja T; Memon S; Ahmed N; Dawani K
    Cureus; 2020 May; 12(5):e8344. PubMed ID: 32617218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rate of hospitalization for gynecologic disorders among reproductive-age women in the United States.
    Velebil P; Wingo PA; Xia Z; Wilcox LS; Peterson HB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 86(5):764-9. PubMed ID: 7566845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnoses for hysterectomy.
    Lee NC; Dicker RC; Rubin GL; Ory HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Oct; 150(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 6486193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].
    Tan XJ; Lang JH; Shen K; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Leng JH; Zhu L
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 25(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 12974083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysterectomy rates for benign indications.
    Jacobson GF; Shaber RE; Armstrong MA; Hung YY
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 107(6):1278-83. PubMed ID: 16738152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census.
    Luoto R; Keskimäki I; Reunanen A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Feb; 51(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 9135791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysterectomy surveillance--United States, 1980-1993.
    Lepine LA; Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA; Koonin LM; Morrow B; Kieke BA; Wilcox LS
    MMWR CDC Surveill Summ; 1997 Aug; 46(4):1-15. PubMed ID: 9259214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysterectomy in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
    Weaver F; Hynes D; Goldberg JM; Khuri S; Daley J; Henderson W
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):880-4. PubMed ID: 11384689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.