These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7968835)

  • 1. A "minimal" data base for dose-response studies in radiation oncology.
    Cohen L
    Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1049-52. PubMed ID: 7968835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on "Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose" [Med. Phys. 24, 103-109 (1997)].
    McGary JE; Grant W; Woo SY; Butler EB
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1323-4; author reply 1325-7. PubMed ID: 9284258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose painting and theragnostic imaging: towards the prescription, planning and delivery of biologically targeted dose distributions in external beam radiation oncology.
    Bentzen SM
    Cancer Treat Res; 2008; 139():41-62. PubMed ID: 18236711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of the linear-quadratic model in clinical radiation oncology can be defended on the basis of empirical evidence and theoretical argument.
    Brenner DJ; Herbert DE
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1245-8. PubMed ID: 9284247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.
    Kutcher GJ; Coia L; Gillin M; Hanson WF; Leibel S; Morton RJ; Palta JR; Purdy JA; Reinstein LE; Svensson GK
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):581-618. PubMed ID: 8058027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Database supported electronic retrospective analyses in radiation oncology: establishing a workflow using the example of pancreatic cancer].
    Kessel KA; Habermehl D; Bohn C; Jäger A; Floca RO; Zhang L; Bougatf N; Bendl R; Debus J; Combs SE
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2012 Dec; 188(12):1119-24. PubMed ID: 23108385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comment on "Point/Counterpoint: The use of the linear-quadratic model in clinical radiation oncology can be defended on the basis of empirical evidence and theoretical argument" [Med. Phys. 24, 1245-1248 (1997)].
    Herbert D
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1329. PubMed ID: 9284259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation doses in radiation therapy are not safe.
    Norman A; Kagan AR
    Med Phys; 1997 Nov; 24(11):1710-3. PubMed ID: 9394278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TCP and NTCP in preclinical and clinical research in Europe.
    Baumann M; Petersen C; Krause M
    Rays; 2005; 30(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 16294904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Big Data and machine learning in radiation oncology: State of the art and future prospects.
    Bibault JE; Giraud P; Burgun A
    Cancer Lett; 2016 Nov; 382(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 27241666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pencil kernel correction and residual error estimation for quality-index-based dose calculations.
    Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Georg D; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6245-62. PubMed ID: 17110783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Output factors for fields defined by four independent collimators.
    Murray B; McClean B; Field C
    Med Phys; 1995 Mar; 22(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 7596317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
    Lefresne S; Olivotto IA; Joe H; Blood PA; Olson RA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):e117-21. PubMed ID: 23195781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic.
    Yang D; Wu Y; Brame RS; Yaddanapudi S; Rangaraj D; Li HH; Goddu SM; Mutic S
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4726-32. PubMed ID: 22894397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Number of patients potentially eligible for proton therapy.
    Glimelius B; Ask A; Bjelkengren G; Björk-Eriksson T; Blomquist E; Johansson B; Karlsson M; Zackrisson B
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(8):836-49. PubMed ID: 16332591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A proposal for a standard electronic anthropomorphic phantom for radiotherapy.
    Aldridge JS; Reckwerdt PJ; Mackie TR
    Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1901-3. PubMed ID: 10505879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image-guided radiation therapy: from concept to practice.
    Jaffray DA
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2007 Oct; 17(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 17903701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance of treatment plans for optimized high dose rate brachytherapy--planar implants.
    Ezzell GA
    Med Phys; 1994 May; 21(5):659-61. PubMed ID: 7935200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analyzing the main trade-offs in multiobjective radiation therapy treatment planning databases.
    Spalke T; Craft D; Bortfeld T
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3741-54. PubMed ID: 19478382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Present and future innovations in radiation oncology.
    Rosenberg L; Tepper J
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2013 Jul; 22(3):599-618. PubMed ID: 23622082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.