These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7969306)
1. The accuracy of mammographic interpretation. Kopans DB N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1521-2. PubMed ID: 7969306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Descriptive terms for mammographic abnormalities: observer variation in application. The Northern Region Breast Screening Radiology Audit Group. Simpson W; Neilson F; Kelly PJ Clin Radiol; 1996 Oct; 51(10):709-13. PubMed ID: 8893641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. Elmore JG; Wells CK; Lee CH; Howard DH; Feinstein AR N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1493-9. PubMed ID: 7969300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Early diagnosis of breast carcinoma by mammographic demonstration of nonpalpable tumors]. Dymarskiĭ LIu; Chernomordikova MF; Semiglazov VF; Popova RT Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 6878661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The American College of Radiology mammography lexicon: an initial attempt to standardize terminology. D'Orsi CJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):779-80. PubMed ID: 8610548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. Clark R J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):936. PubMed ID: 15956657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of galactography in the secreting breast]. Kambouris T; Wenz W; Kotoulas K; Pontifex G Fortschr Med; 1978 Aug; 96(29):1443-6. PubMed ID: 669539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. Kopans DB J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 May; 95(10):758-9. PubMed ID: 12759394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of breast carcinoma. Jacoby JH N J Med; 1991 Jul; 88(7):493-4. PubMed ID: 1891127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observer variability in mammography. Howard DH; Elmore JG; Lee CH; Wells CK; Feinstein AR Trans Assoc Am Physicians; 1993; 106():96-100. PubMed ID: 8036750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of mammography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant disease. Gold RH Oncology; 1969; 23(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 5787936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. Moskowitz M; Gartside P; McLaughlin C Radiology; 1980 Feb; 134(2):293-5. PubMed ID: 7352202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Bayesian network for mammography. Burnside E; Rubin D; Shachter R Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():106-10. PubMed ID: 11079854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ["Interventional radiology" in breast examination]. Frolov IM Vopr Onkol; 2000; 46(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 11219938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]