BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7970478)

  • 1. Development of a cesarean delivery risk score.
    Hueston WJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):965-8. PubMed ID: 7970478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of risk scoring scheme for prediction of cesarean delivery due to cephalopelvic disproportion in Lamphun Hospital, Thailand.
    Khunpradit S; Patumanond J; Tawichasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 17688610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of risk scoring scheme for cesarean delivery due to cephalopelvic disproportion in Lamphun Hospital.
    Khunpradit S; Patumanond J; Tawichasri C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S163-8. PubMed ID: 17726817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined logistic and Bayesian modeling of cesarean section risk.
    Smith GC; Dellens M; White IR; Pell JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2029-34. PubMed ID: 15592287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of cesarean delivery in macrosomia.
    Mazouni C; Rouzier R; Collette E; Menard JP; Magnin G; Gamerre M; Deter R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 18446534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antepartum and intrapartum prediction of cesarean need: risk scoring in singleton pregnancies.
    Hin LY; Lau TK; Rogers M; Chang AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 9241289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planned vaginal delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: prenatal determinants predictive of elevated risk of cesarean delivery during labor.
    Roman H; Carayol M; Watier L; Le Ray C; Breart G; Goffinet F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 17689853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk scoring system for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury.
    Williams A; Tincello DG; White S; Adams EJ; Alfirevic Z; Richmond DH
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1066-9. PubMed ID: 16045519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.
    Peregrine E; O'Brien P; Omar R; Jauniaux E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):227-33. PubMed ID: 16449105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A risk score for selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Phaloprakarn C; Tangjitgamol S; Manusirivithaya S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 19446948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting cesarean delivery with decision tree models.
    Sims CJ; Meyn L; Caruana R; Rao RB; Mitchell T; Krohn M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1198-206. PubMed ID: 11084566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A preoperative and intraoperative predictive model of prolonged intensive care unit stay for valvular surgery.
    Xu J; Ge Y; Pan S; Liu F; Shi Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 16607904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of amniotic fluid index for oligohydramnios in patients with prolonged pregnancies.
    O'Reilly-Green CP; Divon MY
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 8796797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The probability of spontaneous delivery -- possibility and limits of obstetric risk scores].
    David M; Pachaly J; Vetter K
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2002; 206(6):219-27. PubMed ID: 12476396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars].
    Lehmann M; Hedelin G; Sorgue C; Göllner JL; Grall C; Chami A; Collin D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Jul; 28(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 10480067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a scoring system for predicting the risk of preterm birth in women receiving cervical cerclage.
    Odibo AO; Farrell C; Macones GA; Berghella V
    J Perinatol; 2003 Dec; 23(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 14647165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of maternal age on blood loss during parturition: a retrospective multivariate analysis of 10,053 cases.
    Ohkuchi A; Onagawa T; Usui R; Koike T; Hiratsuka M; Izumi A; Ohkusa T; Matsubara S; Sato I; Suzuki M; Minakami H
    J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 12825476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.