These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7971102)

  • 1. Visual search for global and local stimulus features.
    Saarinen J
    Perception; 1994; 23(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 7971102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search at different spatial scales.
    Saarinen J
    Scand J Psychol; 1995 Mar; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 7725072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Target localisation and identification in rapid visual search.
    Saarinen J
    Perception; 1996; 25(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 8804093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning in combined-feature search: specificity to orientation.
    Campana G; Casco C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1197-207. PubMed ID: 14710955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local and global factors of similarity in visual search.
    von Grünau M; Dubé S; Galera C
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):575-92. PubMed ID: 8008558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Focal visual attention and pattern discrimination.
    Saarinen J
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 8414877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields.
    Royden CS; Wolfe JM; Klempen N
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 11414131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models.
    Morgan MJ; Ward RM; Castet E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):347-70. PubMed ID: 9621843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search.
    Wang Q; Cavanagh P; Green M
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7991347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orientation categories used in guidance of attention in visual search can differ in strength.
    Kong G; Alais D; Van der Burg E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2246-2256. PubMed ID: 28733837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'Where' and 'what' in visual search.
    Atkinson J; Braddick OJ
    Perception; 1989; 18(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 2771603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.
    Shen J; Reingold EM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 11414134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of shape orientation depends on salient axes of symmetry and elongation: evidence from visual search.
    Boutsen L; Marendaz C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):404-22. PubMed ID: 11414129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search for single and combined features by children and adults: possible developmental inferences.
    Casco C; Gidiuli O; Grieco A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 2):1169-80. PubMed ID: 11219659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.
    Bravo MJ; Nakayama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 1594436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit learning of ignored visual context.
    Jiang Y; Leung AW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 15948286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: evidence from visual search.
    O'Toole AJ; Walker CL
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):202-18. PubMed ID: 9055616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?
    Cheal M; Lyon DR; Hubbard DC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):825-57. PubMed ID: 1775666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.