271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7971186)
1. [Ability of subtraction and dynamic MR imaging to detect breast tumors: comparison with ultrasonography and mammography].
Terao E; Takeuchi H; Iwamura A; Murakami Y; Harada J; Tada S
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 54(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 7971186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Subtraction and dynamic MR images of breast cancer].
Murakami Y; Aoki M; Harada J
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Apr; 53(4):375-86. PubMed ID: 8493070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microinvasive ductal carcinoma arising within a fibroadenoma: A case report.
Shin JH; Choi HY; Lee SN; Kim YJ
Acta Radiol; 2006 Sep; 47(7):643-5. PubMed ID: 16950696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Application of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI and post-processing technique for diagnosis of breast cancer].
Peng KQ; Huang ZL; Xie CM; Chen L; Ouyang Y; Zheng QS; Zhang Y; He HQ; Wu PH
Ai Zheng; 2009 May; 28(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 19624888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis.
Yuen S; Uematsu T; Kasami M; Tanaka K; Kimura K; Sanuki J; Uchida Y; Furukawa H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 17326093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Efficacy of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using echo-planar imaging in differential diagnosis of breast tumors].
Yoshino A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jul; 58(8):441-6. PubMed ID: 9745258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Enhanced MRI of breast cancer smaller than 3 cm].
Ikeda Y; Narabayashi I; Yoshida S; Motohara T; Koizumi T; Ogawa K; Mieda C; Ueda E; Hirota S; Oshitani T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Nov; 51(11):1314-23. PubMed ID: 1662800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [MR tomographic characterization of suspicious breast lesions with dynamic susceptibility-weighted T2* sequences].
Dannert S; Krück W; Schick F; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2001 Jan; 173(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 11225415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using fat-suppressed dynamic MR imaging].
Koshiishi T; Isomoto I; Nakamura K; Kajiwara Y; Izawa K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jul; 58(8):433-40. PubMed ID: 9745257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of phyllodes breast tumors from fibroadenomas on MRI.
Wurdinger S; Herzog AB; Fischer DR; Marx C; Raabe G; Schneider A; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1317-21. PubMed ID: 16247156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Monstrous breast tumor].
Knopp MV; Junkermann H; Sinn HP
Radiologe; 1995 May; 35(5):363-6. PubMed ID: 7610255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
