These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7971186)

  • 1. [Ability of subtraction and dynamic MR imaging to detect breast tumors: comparison with ultrasonography and mammography].
    Terao E; Takeuchi H; Iwamura A; Murakami Y; Harada J; Tada S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 54(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 7971186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Subtraction and dynamic MR images of breast cancer].
    Murakami Y; Aoki M; Harada J
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Apr; 53(4):375-86. PubMed ID: 8493070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microinvasive ductal carcinoma arising within a fibroadenoma: A case report.
    Shin JH; Choi HY; Lee SN; Kim YJ
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Sep; 47(7):643-5. PubMed ID: 16950696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI and post-processing technique for diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Peng KQ; Huang ZL; Xie CM; Chen L; Ouyang Y; Zheng QS; Zhang Y; He HQ; Wu PH
    Ai Zheng; 2009 May; 28(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 19624888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
    Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
    Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis.
    Yuen S; Uematsu T; Kasami M; Tanaka K; Kimura K; Sanuki J; Uchida Y; Furukawa H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 17326093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Efficacy of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using echo-planar imaging in differential diagnosis of breast tumors].
    Yoshino A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jul; 58(8):441-6. PubMed ID: 9745258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
    Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Enhanced MRI of breast cancer smaller than 3 cm].
    Ikeda Y; Narabayashi I; Yoshida S; Motohara T; Koizumi T; Ogawa K; Mieda C; Ueda E; Hirota S; Oshitani T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Nov; 51(11):1314-23. PubMed ID: 1662800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
    Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
    Kaiser WA
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [MR tomographic characterization of suspicious breast lesions with dynamic susceptibility-weighted T2* sequences].
    Dannert S; Krück W; Schick F; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Rofo; 2001 Jan; 173(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 11225415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using fat-suppressed dynamic MR imaging].
    Koshiishi T; Isomoto I; Nakamura K; Kajiwara Y; Izawa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jul; 58(8):433-40. PubMed ID: 9745257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiation of phyllodes breast tumors from fibroadenomas on MRI.
    Wurdinger S; Herzog AB; Fischer DR; Marx C; Raabe G; Schneider A; Kaiser WA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1317-21. PubMed ID: 16247156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Monstrous breast tumor].
    Knopp MV; Junkermann H; Sinn HP
    Radiologe; 1995 May; 35(5):363-6. PubMed ID: 7610255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.