These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7971340)

  • 1. The case to answer. Pay review body evidence.
    Carlisle D
    Nurs Times; 1994 Sep 28-Oct 4; 90(39):18-9. PubMed ID: 7971340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurses's pay: a solid case.
    Sylvester J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Oct; 4(5):22. PubMed ID: 2511481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurses' pay: what the government said.
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1988 Feb 10-16; 84(6):20. PubMed ID: 3353252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rules of attraction.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Feb 22-8; 91(8):19. PubMed ID: 7885900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Royal College of Nursing. Right message.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1986 Aug; (460):4. PubMed ID: 3637670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurses' pay--the facts. Evidence to the Pay Review Body for nursing and midwifery staff and the professions allied to medicine.
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1984 Feb; (334):i-iv. PubMed ID: 6560685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The writing is on the wall.
    Cole A
    Nurs Times; 1987 Dec 16-29; 83(50):18. PubMed ID: 3432068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence to the Pay Review Body on behalf of the National Association of Theatre Nurses.
    NATNEWS; 1988 Jun; 25(6):7. PubMed ID: 3412441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence to the review body for nursing staff, midwives, health visitors and professions allied to medicine for 1988. The national shortage of midwives is the most serious crisis at this time.
    Munro A
    Midwives Chron; 1988 Jan; 101(1200):suppl 1-60. PubMed ID: 3347173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NATN evidence to the Nurses Pay Review Body.
    NATNEWS; 1987 May; 24(5):11. PubMed ID: 3648481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RCM evidence to--the Pay Review Body for nursing and midwifery staffs and the professions allied to medicine 1985.
    Midwives Chron; 1985 Feb; 98(1165):suppl 1-30. PubMed ID: 3844596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pay review body evidence 2006.
    Adkins C
    Community Pract; 2006 Dec; 79(12):410-1. PubMed ID: 17256287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nursing nursing back to health.
    Hancock C
    Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9132):992. PubMed ID: 9752849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial views on pay review body.
    Ellis S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1983 Jan; (277):1. PubMed ID: 6550405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparability report: where Clegg falls so short.
    Hancock C; Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 6898136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence to the Nurses Pay Review Body on behalf of the National Association of Theatre Nurses 1990.
    NATNEWS; 1990 Jun; 27(6):4. PubMed ID: 2395453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pay Review Body: body blow or a minor injury?
    Naish J
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Dec 9-15; 7(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 1489700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The beginning of a new era? Pay review body.
    Gray A
    Nurs Times; 1983 Aug 10-16; 79(32):13-4. PubMed ID: 6555707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pay review body - golden chance or con-trick?
    Rowden R; Armstrong M
    Nurs Times; 1982 Dec 15-21; 78(50):2102-3. PubMed ID: 6925207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.