These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 797177)

  • 1. [Automation in the cytodiagnostic central laboratory (to meet the high requirements of obligatory gynecologic cytodiagnosis)].
    Jaugitz H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(23):1426-9. PubMed ID: 797177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated cytology. A symposium by correspondence. Chapter V. Requirements of preparation and sample collection problems.
    Acta Cytol; 1971; 15(3):216-35. PubMed ID: 4104210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
    Renshaw AA
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian experience in cytology proficiency testing.
    Thompson DW
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):484-6. PubMed ID: 2546350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automation in cervical cancer screening. Part 1: fixed cell scanning systems.
    Husain OA; Tucker JH; Roberts BA
    Biomed Eng; 1976 May; 11(5):161-6. PubMed ID: 945084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Screening for cancer of the cervix. Program of the Central Region of Portugal].
    da Silva DP; Real O
    Acta Med Port; 1997 Oct; 10(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 9477587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology.
    Herbert A; Bergeron C; Wiener H; Schenck U; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Arbyn M
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 17635161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Significance of sources of error and quality control in cytologic mass screening].
    Zimmer S; Krahnert U; Munck C
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 3591056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A reply on cervix cancer screening: cervical cytological test doesn't fulfil the requirements of a good screening test].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(37):4042. PubMed ID: 11036367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Chances, possibilities and effects of new installations, mainly automated protocols in the field of cytology as well as cytologic early cancer diagnosis].
    Winkler W
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():187-207. PubMed ID: 6353173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methods requirements of cytodiagnostic screening].
    Magát A
    Cesk Gynekol; 1969 Jul; 34(6):333-4. PubMed ID: 5800078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Impulse cytophotometric measurements on atypical cell smears from vagina and cervix uteri].
    Göhde W; Dittrich W; Zinser KH; Prieshof J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 May; 32(5):382-93. PubMed ID: 4558244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FocalPoint slide classification algorithms show robust performance in classification of high-grade lesions on SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology slides.
    Parker EM; Foti JA; Wilbur DC
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 14755762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flow-through-cytophotometry--a step towards automated cytology?
    Sprenger E; Sandritter W; Böhm N; Wagner D; Hilgarth M; Schaden M
    Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 4113843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Results at the cytodiagnostic examination station at the Greifswald University Gynecologic Clinic during 1952-1963].
    Kruschwitz S; Lützenberger P
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1965 Jun; 87(26):881-7. PubMed ID: 5836861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The incidence of borderline and pathologic findings in young females within the scope of gynecologic-cytologic screening studies].
    Neumann HG; Barten G; Barten M; Schröder M
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989; 111(14):947-51. PubMed ID: 2800778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the feasibility of single lifetime PAP smear evaluation between 41-50 years of age as strategy for cervical cancer control in developing countries from our 32 years of experience of hospital-based routine cytological screening.
    Misra JS; Gupta HP; Das V
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Dec; 31(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 15540174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer of the cervix--early detection--effective control.
    Tomb J
    J Med Liban; 1970; 23(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 5473315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated screening versus manual screening: a comparison of the ThinPrep imaging system and manual screening in a time study.
    Schledermann D; Hyldebrandt T; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 17497655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.