These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7972845)

  • 21. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nursing and the law. Documentation and 'usual practice'.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurs J; 1994 Sep; 2(3):38-9. PubMed ID: 7834072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Expanding role and legal liability.
    Dean KA
    Focus Crit Care; 1983 Oct; 10(5):23-5. PubMed ID: 6557948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The evolution of a claim in a medical malpractice case.
    Resh C
    Natl Med Leg J; 1991; 2(2):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 1747429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Failure to file suit timely: doctrine of Contra Non Valentem. Case in point: Wimberly v. Schumpert Med. Center 641 So. 2d 1016--LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 7838973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can one sue for both wrongful death & survival?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Jan; 49(8):4. PubMed ID: 19266953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lawsuits and nurses.
    McLean PA
    AARN News Lett; 1994 Feb; 50(2):9. PubMed ID: 8154242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extinguishment of the liability of the agent releases the principal in Ohio. Comer v. Risko, 106 Ohio St. 3d 185, 833 N.E. 2d 712 (Ohio 2005).
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2005; 25(4):41-2. PubMed ID: 23631025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Failure to timely report test results: cause of stillbirth? Case in point: Clancy v. Euclid General Hospital (584 N.E. 2d 763--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):2. PubMed ID: 1594770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.