These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7973062)

  • 1. [Importance of the back muscles in rehabilitation of postoperative segmental lumbar instability--a biomechanical analysis].
    Steffen R; Nolte LP; Pingel TH
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1994 Aug; 33(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 7973062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
    Galler RM; Dogan S; Fifield MS; Bozkus H; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
    Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of a posterolateral lumbar disc arthroplasty device: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kikkawa J; Cunningham BW; Shirado O; Hu N; McAfee PC; Oda H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1760-8. PubMed ID: 20508551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker.
    Shim CS; Park SW; Lee SH; Lim TJ; Chun K; Kim DH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E820-7. PubMed ID: 18923305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The effect of various nucleotomy techniques on biomechanical properties of the intervertebral disk].
    Zöllner J; Rosendahl T; Herbsthofer B; Humke T; Eysel P
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 10441823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facet joint biomechanics at the treated and adjacent levels after total disc replacement.
    Botolin S; Puttlitz C; Baldini T; Petrella A; Burger E; Abjornson C; Patel V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):E27-32. PubMed ID: 20975623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
    Little JP; Adam CJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
    Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of slouching and lumbar support on iliolumbar ligaments, intervertebral discs and sacroiliac joints.
    Snijders CJ; Hermans PF; Niesing R; Spoor CW; Stoeckart R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 May; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 15109750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanics of lumbar arthroplasty.
    Crawford NR
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):595-602, v. PubMed ID: 16326282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Index level mobility after total lumbar disc replacement: is it beneficial or detrimental?
    Cakir B; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Fraitzl CR; Reichel H; Käfer W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):917-23. PubMed ID: 19532000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.