These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7973211)

  • 1. The CHART trials: Bayesian design and monitoring in practice. CHART Steering Committee.
    Parmar MK; Spiegelhalter DJ; Freedman LS
    Stat Med; 1994 Jul 15-30; 13(13-14):1297-312. PubMed ID: 7973211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study.
    Bojke L; Soares M; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples L; Taylor A
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(37):1-124. PubMed ID: 34105510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of transcultural psychotherapy to treat resistant major depressive disorder in children and adolescents from migrant families: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial using mixed method and Bayesian approaches.
    Lachal J; Moro MR; Carretier E; Simon A; Barry C; Falissard B; Rouquette A
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2020 Dec; 29(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 32918513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjusting trial results for biases in meta-analysis: combining data-based evidence on bias with detailed trial assessment.
    Rhodes KM; Savović J; Elbers R; Jones HE; Higgins JPT; Sterne JAC; Welton NJ; Turner RM
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2020 Jan; 183(1):193-209. PubMed ID: 31857745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian clinical trials at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: An update.
    Tidwell RSS; Peng SA; Chen M; Liu DD; Yuan Y; Lee JJ
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):645-656. PubMed ID: 31450957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and conduct of a provider survey to determine a clinically persuasive effect size in planning VA Cooperative Study #590 (Li+).
    Harrington KM; Liang MH; Hannagan K; Thwin SS; Ferguson RE; Morgenstern N; Flores E; Katz IR
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2016 Dec; 4():149-154. PubMed ID: 29736478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External data required timely response by the Trial Steering-Data Monitoring Committee for the NALoxone InVEstigation (N-ALIVE) pilot trial.
    Bird SM; Strang J; Ashby D; Podmore J; Robertson JR; Welch S; Meade AM; Parmar MKB
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2017 Mar; 5():100-106. PubMed ID: 28424796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of Bayesian monitoring methods in deciding whether and when to stop a clinical trial: an example of a neonatal cooling trial.
    Pedroza C; Tyson JE; Das A; Laptook A; Bell EF; Shankaran S;
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):335. PubMed ID: 27450203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying veterinarians' beliefs on disease control and exploring the effect of new evidence: a Bayesian approach.
    Higgins HM; Huxley JN; Wapenaar W; Green MJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3394-408. PubMed ID: 24679936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assurance calculations for planning clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes.
    Ren S; Oakley JE
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 23861270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prior elicitation and Bayesian analysis of the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial.
    See CW; Srinivasan M; Saravanan S; Oldenburg CE; Esterberg EJ; Ray KJ; Glaser TS; Tu EY; Zegans ME; McLeod SD; Acharya NR; Lietman TM
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 23171211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian elicitation of veterinary beliefs regarding systemic dry cow therapy: variation and importance for clinical trial design.
    Higgins HM; Dryden IL; Green MJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2012 Sep; 106(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 22336321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A statistical framework for quantifying clinical equipoise for individual cases during randomized controlled surgical trials.
    Parsons NR; Kulikov Y; Girling A; Griffin D
    Trials; 2011 Dec; 12():258. PubMed ID: 22166100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How much can we learn about missing data?: an exploration of a clinical trial in psychiatry.
    Jackson D; White IR; Leese M
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2010 Jul; 173(3):593-612. PubMed ID: 20711246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian analysis of a mastitis control plan to investigate the influence of veterinary prior beliefs on clinical interpretation.
    Green MJ; Browne WJ; Green LE; Bradley AJ; Leach KA; Breen JE; Medley GF
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):209-17. PubMed ID: 19576643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting trial results in light of conflicting evidence: a Bayesian analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Miksad RA; Gönen M; Lynch TJ; Roberts TG
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 May; 27(13):2245-52. PubMed ID: 19307513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing electrothermal arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy versus open inferior capsular shift for patients with shoulder instability: protocol implementation and interim performance: lessons learned from conducting a multi-centre RCT [ISRCTN68224911; NCT00251160].
    Mohtadi NG; Hollinshead RM; Ceponis PJ; Chan DS; Fick GH
    Trials; 2006 Feb; 7():4. PubMed ID: 16542033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategy for randomised clinical trials in rare cancers.
    Tan SB; Dear KB; Bruzzi P; Machin D
    BMJ; 2003 Jul; 327(7405):47-9. PubMed ID: 12842959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian re-assessment of two Phase II trials of gemcitabine in metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.
    Tan SB; Machin D; Tai BC; Foo KF; Tan EH
    Br J Cancer; 2002 Mar; 86(6):843-50. PubMed ID: 11953813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculation for clinical trials: the impact of clinician beliefs.
    Fayers PM; Cuschieri A; Fielding J; Craven J; Uscinska B; Freedman LS
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 10638992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.