BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7973241)

  • 1. A simulation study comparing two approximations for a quasi t-quantile, used in repeated measures ANOVA.
    Silverberg AR
    Stat Med; 1994 Aug; 13(16):1657-63. PubMed ID: 7973241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An extension of Satterthwaite's approximation applied to pharmacokinetics.
    Nedelman JR; Jia X
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 May; 8(2):317-28. PubMed ID: 9598425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A COMPARISON OF POWER APPROXIMATIONS FOR SATTERTHWAITE'S TEST.
    Disantostefano RL; Muller KE
    Commun Stat Simul Comput; 1995; 24(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 24078764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More on the means comparison with unequal variances problem.
    Ames MH
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 May; 6(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 8732912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On using an approximate noncentral t-distribution in determining a one-side upper limit for future sample relative reproducibility standard deviations.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(2):575-81. PubMed ID: 17474527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A practical approach for comparing means of two groups without equal variance assumption.
    Wang H; Chow SC
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3137-51. PubMed ID: 12369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing a single case to a control group - Applying linear mixed effects models to repeated measures data.
    Huber S; Klein E; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():148-59. PubMed ID: 26218619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of interval estimations in design and evaluation of multiregional clinical trials with continuous outcomes.
    Chiang C; Hsiao CF
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2179-2195. PubMed ID: 29355082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
    Gosho M; Maruo K
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher-moment approaches to approximate interval estimation for a certain intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Zou KH; McDermott MP
    Stat Med; 1999 Aug; 18(15):2051-61. PubMed ID: 10440886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation and interpretation of results for three cross-over designs.
    Guiard V; Spilke J; Dänicke S
    Arch Tierernahr; 2003 Jun; 57(3):177-95. PubMed ID: 12903863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R.
    Luke SG
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1494-1502. PubMed ID: 27620283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiplicity adjustments for the Dunnett procedure under heterokcedasticity.
    Tamhane AC; Xi D
    Biom J; 2023 Dec; 65(8):e2200300. PubMed ID: 37789586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solutions to the Behrens-Fisher problem.
    Reed JF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Mar; 70(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 12581558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem with dependent replicates.
    Roy A; Harrar SW; Konietschke F
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(25):4939-4962. PubMed ID: 31424122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comments on Nedelman and Jia's extension of Satterthwaite's approximation applied to pharmacokinetics.
    Holder DJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):75-9. PubMed ID: 11459444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.