BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7973717)

  • 1. Cancer researcher returns grant.
    Holden C
    Science; 1994 Nov; 266(5189):1318. PubMed ID: 7973717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Funding of NIH grant applications: update.
    Mandel HG
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5220):13-4. PubMed ID: 7604271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Funding of newly submitted NIH grant applications.
    Mandel HG
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5192):1789. PubMed ID: 7997868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Block grant opposed for NIH clinical centre.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6576):658. PubMed ID: 8614446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human Cancer Genome Project moving forward despite some doubts in community.
    Garber K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Sep; 97(18):1322-4. PubMed ID: 16174849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rethinking grant peer review.
    Fliesler SJ
    Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5305):1399. PubMed ID: 9072799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Funding mechanisms for research through the National Cancer Institute.
    Clifford CK
    Cancer Res; 1993 May; 53(10 Suppl):2434s-2435s. PubMed ID: 8485731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review proposes shift in US cancer funding.
    Taylor R
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6529):267. PubMed ID: 7753181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomy of a grant: Michael Imperiale.
    Bhattacharjee Y
    Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6179):33. PubMed ID: 24700842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. science and austerity. Darwinism vs. social engineering at NIH.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6057):753-4. PubMed ID: 22076357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomedical funding. A bumpy landing for cancer research.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5660):936-7. PubMed ID: 14963292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer centers and cancer research: the need for recognition and increased funding.
    Durbin RJ
    Int J Cell Cloning; 1990 Nov; 8(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 2273294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The readers NIH.
    Varki A
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5082):532. PubMed ID: 1411561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. science policy. What can NIH do for physicists?
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5701):1463. PubMed ID: 15567829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. USA must invest in clinical research.
    Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9102):535. PubMed ID: 9492765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The readers' NIH.
    Rudell AP
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5082):530. PubMed ID: 1411554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The readers' NIH.
    Gardner CA
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5082):530-1. PubMed ID: 1296608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.