These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7973756)

  • 1. Bone scintigraphy and multimodality imaging in bone neoplasia: strategies for imaging in the new health care climate.
    Pomeranz SJ; Pretorius HT; Ramsingh PS
    Semin Nucl Med; 1994 Jul; 24(3):188-207. PubMed ID: 7973756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple imaging modalities in the evaluation of musculoskeletal masses.
    Yiu-Chiu V; Chiu L
    J Comput Tomogr; 1982 Dec; 6(3):201-23. PubMed ID: 7160195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practical use of imaging technique for management of bone and soft tissue tumors.
    Miwa S; Otsuka T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 28161235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary musculoskeletal tumors: examination with MR imaging compared with conventional modalities.
    Pettersson H; Gillespy T; Hamlin DJ; Enneking WF; Springfield DS; Andrew ER; Spanier S; Slone R
    Radiology; 1987 Jul; 164(1):237-41. PubMed ID: 3588912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiological diagnosis of skeletal metastases.
    Söderlund V
    Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 8934120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with benign and malignant bone tumors.
    Gersing AS; Pfeiffer D; Kopp FK; Schwaiger BJ; Knebel C; Haller B; Noël PB; Settles M; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29948069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic imaging of musculoskeletal neoplasia.
    Sanders TG; Parsons TW
    Cancer Control; 2001; 8(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 11378648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in musculoskeletal neoplasms.
    Tehranzadeh J; Mnaymneh W; Ghavam C; Morillo G; Murphy BJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1989; 13(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 2723178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: which one is the best?--a meta-analysis.
    Liu T; Xu JY; Xu W; Bai YR; Yan WL; Yang HL
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Jun; 23(5):350-8. PubMed ID: 21094027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal benign bone-forming lesions.
    Cerase A; Priolo F
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 1():S91-7. PubMed ID: 9652508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negative bone scintigraphy with diffuse osteoblastic breast carcinoma metastases.
    Brown B; Laorr A; Greenspan A; Stadalnik R
    Clin Nucl Med; 1994 Mar; 19(3):194-6. PubMed ID: 8033466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal neoplasms.
    Berquist TH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Jul; (244):101-18. PubMed ID: 2663282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of bone scintigraphy, bone marrow scintigraphy and fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging in staging of patients with malignant solid tumours: a prospective study.
    Haubold-Reuter BG; Duewell S; Schilcher BR; Marincek B; von Schulthess GK
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1993 Nov; 20(11):1063-9. PubMed ID: 8287874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors: potential pitfalls with MR imaging.
    Ma LD; Frassica FJ; Scott WW; Fishman EK; Zerbouni EA
    Radiographics; 1995 Mar; 15(2):349-66. PubMed ID: 7761640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of MR imaging and CT in the evaluation of musculoskeletal masses.
    Wetzel LH; Levine E; Murphey MD
    Radiographics; 1987 Sep; 7(5):851-74. PubMed ID: 3454031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the radiological management of musculoskeletal tumors.
    Böhm P; Yousry T; Kraus B
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1991; 110(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 2059534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in renal cancer.
    Sohaib SA; Cook G; Allen SD; Hughes M; Eisen T; Gore M
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(980):632-9. PubMed ID: 19221182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiological detection of bone and bone marrow metastases.
    Jacobsson H; Göransson H
    Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother; 1991; 8(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 1820491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Metastatic bone disease. Strategies for imaging].
    Scutellari PN; Antinolfi G; Galeotti R; Giganti M
    Minerva Med; 2003 Apr; 94(2):77-90. PubMed ID: 12858156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.