170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7974502)
1. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Basketter DA
Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 7974502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) production by draining lymph node cells.
Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Ramdin LS; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1994; 14(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 7963242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals.
Ulrich P; Streich J; Suter W
Arch Toxicol; 2001 Feb; 74(12):733-44. PubMed ID: 11305775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The local lymph node assay and potential application to the identification of drug allergens.
Kimber I
Toxicology; 2001 Feb; 158(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11164993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses.
Robinson MK; Cruze CA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: comparisons with the Buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA
J Appl Toxicol; 1990 Jun; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 2380478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ
Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay.
Ashby J; Basketter DA; Paton D; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1995 Dec; 103(3):177-94. PubMed ID: 8553361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay.
Kimber I; Weisenberger C
J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 11(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2061551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guinea-pig contact sensitization assays.
Maurer T; Arthur A; Bentley P
Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 7974504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA
Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study.
Kimber I; Weisenberger C
Arch Toxicol; 1989; 63(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 2788401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
Maurer T; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Harvey P; Evans P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment.
Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10513674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay.
van Och FM; Vandebriel RJ; Prinsen MK; De Jong WH; Slob W; van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2001 Oct; 167(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 11578800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
