These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7974506)

  • 1. Contact sensitization assays in guinea-pigs: are they predictive of the potential for systemic allergic reactions?
    Vial T; Descotes J
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 7974506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guinea-pig contact sensitization assays.
    Maurer T; Arthur A; Bentley P
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 7974504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses.
    Robinson MK; Cruze CA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods.
    Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications.
    Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Basketter DA
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 7974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of the cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity (CBH) response for distinguishing weak contact sensitization from irritation reactions in the guinea pig.
    Robinson MK; Fletcher ER; Johnson GR; Wyder WE; Maurer JK
    J Invest Dermatol; 1990 May; 94(5):636-43. PubMed ID: 2324519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitizing potential in mice, guinea pig and man of the preservative Euxyl K 400 and its ingredient methyldibromo glutaronitrile.
    Wahlkvist H; Boman A; Montelius J; Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):330-8. PubMed ID: 10617214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of skin sensitization assays.
    Basketter DA; Chamberlain M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1057-9. PubMed ID: 8847002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anaphylaxis models in the guinea-pig.
    Verdier F; Chazal I; Descotes J
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 7974505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The guinea-pig skin sensitization test revisited: an evaluation formula to predict possible sensitization levels for eight chemicals used in household products.
    Momma J; Kitajima S; Inoue T
    Toxicology; 1998 Feb; 126(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 9585094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What determines skin sensitization potency: Myths, maybes and realities. The 500 molecular weight cut-off: An updated analysis.
    Fitzpatrick JM; Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):105-116. PubMed ID: 27283458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The mouse ear swelling test (MEST) in the 1990s.
    Gad SC
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 7974503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the severity of allergic reactions: a regulatory dilemma.
    Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jul; 67(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22681462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sensitizing potential of various biocides in the guinea pig maximization test.
    Zissu D
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Apr; 46(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 12081701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemical load as a factor in skin sensitization risk assessment: rodent versus man.
    Anigbogu AN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Feb; 44(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11205398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose-response studies of contact allergens using 3 guinea pigs models.
    Wahlkvist H; Boman A; Lidén C
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):198-206. PubMed ID: 10515098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K; Akkan Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tissue reaction to the nickel implants in the guinea pigs.
    Kręcisz B; Kieć-Świerczyńska M; Piasecka-Zelga J; Chomiczewska-Skóra D; Stetkiewicz J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2012 Jun; 25(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 22729492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.