These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7974588)
1. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Eliasziw M; Smith RF; Singh N; Holdsworth DW; Fox AJ; Barnett HJ Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2445-9. PubMed ID: 7974588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Rothwell PM; Gibson RJ; Slattery J; Warlow CP Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2440-4. PubMed ID: 7974587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical value of methods to measure carotid stenosis. Bladin CF; Alexandrova NA; Murphy J; Alexandrov AV; Maggisano R; Norris JW Int Angiol; 1996 Dec; 15(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 9127768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Rothwell PM; Gibson RJ; Slattery J; Sellar RJ; Warlow CP Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2435-9. PubMed ID: 7974586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Angiographic quantification of stenoses of the internal carotid artery]. Bartylla K; Huber G Radiologe; 1995 Nov; 35(11):801-7. PubMed ID: 8657881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of DSA in carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between stenosis measured on carotid endarterectomy specimens and DSA in 644 cases. Svoboda N; Bradac O; Mandys V; Netuka D; Benes V Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3197-3202. PubMed ID: 35945355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis assessment method on indicating carotid surgery. Müller M; Bartylla K; Rolshausen A; Piepgras U; Schimrigk K Vasa; 1998 Feb; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9540429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. Moneta GL; Edwards JM; Chitwood RW; Taylor LM; Lee RW; Cummings CA; Porter JM J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 17(1):152-7; discussion 157-9. PubMed ID: 8421332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid stenosis evaluation by 64-slice CTA: comparison of NASCET, ECST and CC grading methods. Kılıçkap G; Ergun E; Başbay E; Koşar P; Kosar U Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 21858656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trial. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Staikov IN; Arnold M; Mattle HP; Remonda L; Sturzenegger M; Baumgartner RW; Schroth G J Neurol; 2000 Sep; 247(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 11081806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial? Gagne PJ; Matchett J; MacFarland D; Hauer-Jensen M; Barone GW; Eidt JF; Barnes RW J Vasc Surg; 1996 Sep; 24(3):449-55; discussion 455-6. PubMed ID: 8808967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis by arch angiography and duplex ultrasonography--time for a reappraisal? Griffiths GD; Razzaq R; Farrell A; Ashleigh R; Charlesworth D Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 21(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 11237785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carotid stenosis measurement on colour Doppler ultrasound: agreement of ECST, NASCET and CCA methods applied to ultrasound with intra-arterial angiographic stenosis measurement. Wardlaw JM; Lewis S Eur J Radiol; 2005 Nov; 56(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15964165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency and significance of a small distal ICA in carotid artery stenosis. Dix JE; McNulty BJ; Kallmes DF AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Aug; 19(7):1215-8. PubMed ID: 9726455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex with digital subtraction angiography. Padayachee TS; Cox TC; Modaresi KB; Colchester AC; Taylor PR Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1997 Feb; 13(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 9091152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomography angiography-derived area stenosis calculations overestimate degree of carotid stenosis compared with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial-derived diameter stenosis calculations. Arous EJ; Judelson DR; Agrawal A; Dundamadappa SK; Crawford AS; Malka KT; Simons JP; Schanzer A J Vasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(2):579-585.e2. PubMed ID: 33548432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid artery stenosis: external validity of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement method. Eliasziw M; Fox AJ; Sharpe BL; Barnett HJ Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):229-33. PubMed ID: 9205252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]