BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7974754)

  • 1. Mini-lap cholecystectomy--an attractive alternative to conventional cholecystectomy.
    Seenu V; Misra MC
    Trop Gastroenterol; 1994; 15(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 7974754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cholecystectomy with and without drainage: a prospective randomised study.
    Saad AM; el Hassan AM
    East Afr Med J; 1993 Aug; 70(8):499-501. PubMed ID: 8261970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mini-cholecystectomy: a feasible option.
    Saeed N; Nasir T; Burki B; Channa GA
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010; 22(3):68-70. PubMed ID: 22338421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study.
    Yerdel MA; Koksoy C; Aras N; Orita K
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1997 Dec; 7(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 9438632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Transverse minilaparotomy as an access route in right colon disease: a valid alternative to midline laparotomy].
    Stipa F; Barreca M; Lucandri G; Fernades E; Mercantini P; Meli L; Ziparo V
    Chir Ital; 2000; 52(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 10832533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between midline and right transverse incision in right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study.
    Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat D; Boonnuch W; Chinswangwatanakul V; Akaraviputh T; Methasade A; Lertakyamanee N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Aug; 92(8):1003-8. PubMed ID: 19694322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus minicholecystectomy.
    Schmitz R; Rohde V; Treckmann J; Shah S
    Br J Surg; 1997 Dec; 84(12):1683-6. PubMed ID: 9448615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial.
    Kuthe SA; Kaman L; Verma GR; Singh R
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2006; 27(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 16910066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.
    Kearns SR; Connolly EM; McNally S; McNamara DA; Deasy J
    Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 11136307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini-laparotomy for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Laohapensang K; Rerkasem K; Chotirosniramit N
    Int Angiol; 2005 Sep; 24(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 16158032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.
    Sanabria JR; Clavien PA; Cywes R; Strasberg SM
    Can J Surg; 1993 Aug; 36(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8103704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cholecystectomy by minilaparotomy without muscle section: a short-stay procedure.
    Pélissier EP; Blum D; Meyer JM; Girard JF
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1992 Aug; 39(4):294-5. PubMed ID: 1427568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early versus delayed repair of facial fractures in the multiply injured patient.
    Weider L; Hughes K; Ciarochi J; Dunn E
    Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):790-3. PubMed ID: 10432093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery in children with sickle cell disease is associated with a shorter hospital stay.
    Goers T; Panepinto J; Debaun M; Blinder M; Foglia R; Oldham KT; Field JJ
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2008 Mar; 50(3):603-6. PubMed ID: 17480009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.
    Kelley JE; Burrus RG; Burns RP; Graham LD; Chandler KE
    Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8480927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].
    Dirksen CD; Schmitz RF; Hans KM; Nieman FH; Hoogenboom LJ; Go PM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2434-9. PubMed ID: 11776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial cholecystectomy is a safe and efficient method.
    Cakmak A; Genç V; Orozakunov E; Kepenekçi I; Cetinkaya OA; Hazinedaroğlu MS
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(6):701-4. PubMed ID: 20187468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limited incision cholecystectomy.
    Suarez CA; Blandford JM; Suarez EM; Ocariz-Monzon HB; Suarez DL
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1992 Jul; 79(7):459-63. PubMed ID: 1500923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective randomized study of drained and undrained cholecystectomies.
    Locker D; Norwood SH; Torma MJ; Fontenelle LJ
    Am Surg; 1983 Oct; 49(10):528-30. PubMed ID: 6678543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brunei.
    Kok KY; Mathew VV; Tan KK; Yapp SK
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1998 Apr; 8(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 9566565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.