396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7975796)
1. [Effects of persistent occiput posterior presentation on mode of delivery].
Gardberg M; Tuppurainen M
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994 Aug; 198(4):117-9. PubMed ID: 7975796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Instrumental extractions using Thierry's spatulas: evaluation of the risk of perineal laceration according to occiput position in operative deliveries].
Courtois L; Becher P; Maticot-Baptista D; Cour A; Zurlinden B; Millet P; Maisonnette-Escot Y; Riethmuller D; Maillet R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 May; 37(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 18093747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity.
Pearl ML; Roberts JM; Laros RK; Hurd WW
J Reprod Med; 1993 Dec; 38(12):955-61. PubMed ID: 8120853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prophylactic manual rotation of occiput posterior and transverse positions to decrease operative delivery: the PROPOP randomized clinical trial.
Blanc J; Castel P; Mauviel F; Baumstarck K; Bretelle F; D'Ercole C; Haumonte JB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):444.e1-444.e8. PubMed ID: 34033811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breech deliveries in the Cottbus gynecological clinic (1952-66)].
Linz O
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1968 Nov; 28(11):997-1010. PubMed ID: 5708777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001.
Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Sep; 19(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 16966125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome.
Senécal J; Xiong X; Fraser WD;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):763-72. PubMed ID: 15802403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.
Wu JM; Williams KS; Hundley AF; Connolly A; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):525-8; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 16098883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers.
Spong CY; Beall M; Rodrigues D; Ross MG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):433-6. PubMed ID: 7651656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.
Sheiner E; Levy A; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Mazor M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 15024575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes.
Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 16582120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Is primiparity, the only risk factor for type 3 and 4 perineal injury, during delivery?].
Barbier A; Poujade O; Fay R; Thiébaugeorges O; Levardon M; Deval B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Feb; 35(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 17291807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Face presentation in labor].
Quiel V
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(24):1380, 1385-7. PubMed ID: 1808965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Can we still perform instrumental rotations using Thierry's spatula? Preliminary study among primiparous].
Parant O; Simon C; Capdet J; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Reme JM
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Oct; 36(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 17499455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus.
Lazer S; Biale Y; Mazor M; Lewenthal H; Insler V
J Reprod Med; 1986 Jun; 31(6):501-5. PubMed ID: 3735262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
