These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Repeat rates in digital chest radiography and strategies for improvement. Fintelmann F; Pulli B; Abedi-Tari F; Trombley M; Shore MT; Shepard JA; Rosenthal DI J Thorac Imaging; 2012 May; 27(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 22331101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Current status of digital projectional radiography of the chest. Aberle DR; Hansell D; Huang HK J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 2299698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures]. Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The chest picture in the intensive care station as visualized by digital luminescence radiography]. Witte G; Bause HW; Pothmann W; Schwermer B; Schofer M; Bücheler E Rofo; 1988 Nov; 149(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 2848272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology. Salát D; Nikodemová D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems. Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation. Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?]. Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique]. Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study]. Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details]. Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Jung G; Dölken W; Wassmer G; Lackner K Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9711280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]