These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1815 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7976889)
1. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging. Low RN; Sigeti JS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography. Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. Low RN; Francis IR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benign and malignant gynecologic disease: clinical importance of fluid and peritoneal enhancement in the pelvis at MR imaging. Outwater EK; Siegelman ES; Wilson KM; Mitchell DG Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 8685345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with percutaneous ethanol injection: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Bartolozzi C; Lencioni R; Caramella D; Mazzeo S; Ciancia EM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):827-31. PubMed ID: 8141000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images. Hricak H; Finck S; Honda G; Göranson H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May; 158(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 1566664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging? Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Sigeti JS; Foo TK Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 8430191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment of vascular invasion with high-field MR imaging and a phased-array coil. Sironi S; De Cobelli F; Zerbi A; Angeli E; Balzano G; Taccagni G; Di Carlo V; Del Maschio A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Oct; 167(4):997-1001. PubMed ID: 8819400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Peterson MS; Baron RL; Murakami T Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 8888220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T. Whitney WS; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; McDonnell CH; Li KC; Van Dalsem WJ; Low RN; Francis IR; Dabatin JF; Glazer GM Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 8234717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of pancreatic transplant dysfunction: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. Fernandez MP; Bernardino ME; Neylan JF; Olson RA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jun; 156(6):1171-6. PubMed ID: 2028861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions. Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences. Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the normal meninges: comparison of contrast-enhancement patterns on 3D gradient-echo and spin-echo images. Farn JW; Mirowitz SA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 8273651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]