These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977188)

  • 1. Ceramic bracket fracture resistance to second order arch wire activations.
    Lindauer SJ; Macon CR; Browning H; Rubenstein LK; Isaacson RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 7977188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture strengths of ceramic brackets subjected to mesial-distal archwire tipping forces.
    Rhodes RK; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1554165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of ceramic brackets during arch wire torsion.
    Holt MH; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Apr; 99(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 2008887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture strength of ceramic bracket tie wings subjected to tension.
    Johnson G; Walker MP; Kula K
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 15747822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of ceramic brackets during arch wire torsion.
    Aknin PC; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Currier GF; Sinha PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 8540476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ceramic bracket design: an analysis using the finite element method.
    Ghosh J; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Dec; 108(6):575-82. PubMed ID: 7503034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Friction of conventional and silica-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-wire combinations.
    Cha JY; Kim KS; Hwang CJ
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 17029541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of esthetic brackets' resistance to torsional forces from the archwire.
    Nishio C; Mendes Ade M; Almeida MA; Tanaka E; Tanne K; Elias CN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19121499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: a comparative study.
    Flores DA; Caruso JM; Scott GE; Jeiroudi MT
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 2256564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of resistance to second and third order archwire activations of three different varieties of esthetic brackets.
    Ajith S; Gowda AR; Babaji P; Shivaprakash S; Dmello K; Kamble SS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 24552930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental study on the forces released by ceramic preadjusted brackets with low friction vs. conventional elastomeric ligatures.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 18030375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials.
    Anhoury P; Nathanson D; Hughes CV; Socransky S; Feres M; Chou LL
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 12169034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Fehr DE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8456783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets under the effect of bracket width and free wire length.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Bourauel C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Nov; 15(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 23020696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation of clinical failures of single crystal ceramic brackets.
    Viazis AD; Chabot KA; Kucheria CS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jun; 103(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 8506816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.