These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977193)
1. Chin, nose, and lips. Normal ratios in young men and women. Skinazi GL; Lindauer SJ; Isaacson RJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 7977193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method. Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile]. De Coster T Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis. Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study. Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip. Fitzgerald JP; Nanda RS; Currier GF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Oct; 102(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 1456217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial soft tissue values in Persian adults with normal occlusion and well-balanced faces. Taki AA; Oguz F; Abuhijleh E Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):491-4. PubMed ID: 19413374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A cephalometric comparison of skeletal profile and soft tissue profile on adults with normal occlusion]. Seren E Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 2101666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively. Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-perception of the facial profile: an aid in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery. Bullen RN; Kook YA; Kim K; Park JH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 24342575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Michiels G; Sather AH Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationships between facial features in the perception of profile attractiveness. Torsello F; Graci M; Grande NM; Deli R Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 20974445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of Holdaway soft tissue norms in Anatolian Turkish adults. Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 12695766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphometric evaluation of soft-tissue profile shape. Halazonetis DJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17418714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population. Türkkahraman H; Gökalp H Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):640-7. PubMed ID: 15529499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Genecov JS; Sinclair PM; Dechow PC Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2389851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]