These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977205)

  • 1. The integumental profile: a reflection of the underlying skeletal configuration?
    Kuyl MH; Verbeeck RM; Dermaut LR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 7977205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual perception of skeletal class and biotype in Spain.
    Romero-Maroto M; Nieto-Sánchez I; Míguez-Contreras M; López-de-Andrés A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 21562071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography].
    Remmelink HJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 11382969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontists' perceptions of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion based on extraoral examinations.
    Hodge TM; Boyd PT; Munyombwe T; Littlewood SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22748990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Kajikawa Y
    J Oral Surg; 1979 Mar; 37(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 283217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19901039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of soft tissue profile analysis in children.
    Fields HW; Vann WF; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Apr; 52(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 6213182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study of consistency of occlusal type with skeletal pattern and integumental profile].
    Zheng X; Lin J; Xie Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2003 Feb; 35(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 12920811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients deserve the best.
    Tocchini JJ
    Int J Orthod; 1983 Jun; 21(2):5-20. PubMed ID: 6578205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of minimal versus conventional presurgical orthodontics in skeletal class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery.
    Joh B; Bayome M; Park JH; Park JU; Kim Y; Kook YA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1733-41. PubMed ID: 23932114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting vertically altered faces: orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
    Arnett GW; Kreashko RG; Jelic JS
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(4):267-76. PubMed ID: 10196814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.