These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977207)

  • 1. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement.
    Martin S; Garcia-Godoy F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 7977207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
    Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
    Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers.
    Kao EC; Eliades T; Rezvan E; Johnston WM
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 8682171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Theodorakopoulou LP; Sadowsky PL; Jacobson A; Lacefield W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 15014410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strengths of two ceramic brackets using argon laser, light, and chemically cured resin systems.
    Weinberger SJ; Foley TF; McConnell RJ; Wright GZ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 9188960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins.
    Joseph VP; Rossouw E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 2137284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interlayer formation and its effect on debonding polycrystalline alumina orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Rohrer MD; Nanda RS; Brickman CD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Nov; 108(5):455-63. PubMed ID: 7484964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ex vivo shear bond strength of fibreglass reinforced aesthetic brackets.
    Crow V
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Nov; 22(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 8580098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.