These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977207)

  • 21. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on the shear bond strength of metal, ceramic and titanium brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Mahajan V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(6):745-9. PubMed ID: 24552938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Britton JC; McInnes P; Weinberg R; Ledoux WR; Retief DH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 2145756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.
    Cochrane NJ; Lo TWG; Adams GG; Schneider PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 28863911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical acceptability of two self-etch adhesive resins for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Schnebel B; Mateer S; Maganzini AL; Freeman K
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 23269689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study.
    Kim YK; Park HS; Kim KH; Kwon TY
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 25548147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18947278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Boyer DB; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 8638582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of various methods of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Zamtua J; Damon PL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 9714279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Bond Strength of Brackets with Foil Mesh and Laser Structure Base using Light Cure Composite Resin: An in vitro Study.
    Rajesh RN; Girish KS; Sanjay N; Scindhia RD; Kumar SG; Rajesh S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 16(12):963-70. PubMed ID: 27018031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel conditioning.
    Maskeroni AJ; Meyers CE; Lorton L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 2137285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of 6 self-etching primers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Ohashi S; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):424.e1-7; discussion 424-5. PubMed ID: 19361722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.