These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977207)

  • 41. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding.
    Sargison AE; McCabe JF; Millett DT
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 10420249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison between the old Transcend and the new Transcend series 2000 bracket.
    Winchester LJ
    Br J Orthod; 1992 May; 19(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 1627521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In vitro evaluation of microleakage under ceramic and metal brackets bonded with LED and plasma arc curing.
    Davari A; Yassaei S; Karandish M; Zarghami F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):644-9. PubMed ID: 23250168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG; Stein H; Miethke RR; Nakata M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 1476106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of an antioxidizing agent on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to bleached human enamel.
    Bulut H; Turkun M; Kaya AD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 16473720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Cacciafesta V; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Süssenberger U; Miethke RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 9563355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Self-Etching Primer.
    Romano FL; Tavares SW; Nouer DF; Consani S; Borges de Araújo Magnani MB
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):849-53. PubMed ID: 16285044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
    Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics.
    Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 8059747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Elnafar AA; Alam MK; Hasan R
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 25143559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Changes in shear bond strength of ceramic and stainless steel brackets with different visible light curing times and directions.
    Heravi F; Bayani S
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 20043551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.