These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977340)

  • 1. Two-locus disease models with two marker loci: the power of affected-sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Nov; 55(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 7977340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods.
    Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Oct; 53(4):908-15. PubMed ID: 8213819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits.
    Schork NJ; Boehnke M; Terwilliger JD; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Nov; 53(5):1127-36. PubMed ID: 8213836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci.
    Greenberg DA; Doneshka P
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8797007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust multipoint identical-by-descent mapping for affected relative pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Sinnwell JP; Thibodeau SN
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 76(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 15573301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some epistatic two-locus models of disease. I. Relative risks and identity-by-descent distributions in affected sib pairs.
    Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 May; 33(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 6941695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Models and tests of linkage and association studies of quantitative trait locus for multi-allele marker Loci.
    Fan R; Floros J; Xiong M
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 12145549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-locus approach of segregation and linkage analysis in the study of complex traits.
    Xu J; Taylor EW; Panhuysen CI; Prenger VL; Koskela R; Kiemeney B; LaBuda MC; Maestri NE; Meyers DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 8788016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers.
    Holmans P; Clayton D
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 7485174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to model a complex trait. 2. Analysis with two disease loci.
    Strauch K; Fimmers R; Baur MP; Wienker TF
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(4):200-11. PubMed ID: 15031621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    Génin E; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Log-linear models for gene mapping with affected sib pair data.
    Yang Y; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12435886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multipoint linkage analysis using sib pairs: an interval mapping approach for dichotomous outcomes.
    Olson JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Mar; 56(3):788-98. PubMed ID: 7887435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage.
    Tierney C; McKnight B
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.
    Suarez BK; Rice J; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Jul; 42(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 686687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.