These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7977416)

  • 1. HMO care not much different from fee-for-service care, study finds.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Aug; 51(16):1994-5. PubMed ID: 7977416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of functional outcomes after hip fracture in group/staff HMOs and fee-for-service systems.
    Coleman EA; Kramer AM; Kowalsky JC; Eckhoff D; Lin M; Hester EJ; Morgenstern N; Steiner JF
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):229-39. PubMed ID: 11185328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study finds HMO members satisfied.
    Canna M
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 May; 14(5):5. PubMed ID: 10142855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of ineffective or unsafe medications among members of a Medicare HMO compared to individuals in a Medicare fee-for-service program.
    Futterman R; Fillit H; Roglieri JL
    Am J Manag Care; 1997 Apr; 3(4):569-75. PubMed ID: 10169525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of care by insurance plan. A fee-for-service versus health maintenance organization comparison.
    Silcox PD
    Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 14618775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changing nature of physician satisfaction with health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices.
    Schulz R; Scheckler WE; Moberg DP; Johnson PR
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Oct; 45(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 9343053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. By the numbers. Care for arthritis and other chronic conditions.
    Newman M
    Healthplan; 1996; 37(6):93-4. PubMed ID: 10162991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Getting it all done. Organizational factors linked with comprehensive primary care.
    Russell G; Dahrouge S; Tuna M; Hogg W; Geneau R; Gebremichael G
    Fam Pract; 2010 Oct; 27(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 20534791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Medicare fee-for-service and a group-model HMO in the inpatient management and long-term survival of elderly individuals with syncope.
    Getchell WS; Larsen GC; Morris CD; McAnulty JH
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Oct; 6(10):1089-98. PubMed ID: 11184665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality measurement in medicaid managed care and fee-for-service: the New York State experience.
    Roohan PJ; Butch JM; Anarella JP; Gesten F; Shure K
    Am J Med Qual; 2006; 21(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 16679438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicare HMOs, FFS plans provide equal care following heart attack.
    Capitation Rates Data; 2001 Aug; 6(8):92-3. PubMed ID: 11526859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difference in the use of preventive services between fee-for-service plans and HMOs: is more better?
    Wang YR; Pauly MV
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Apr; 9(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 12703673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should we stop making a fuss over HMOs?
    Pretzer M
    Med Econ; 2000 May; 77(10):41, 45. PubMed ID: 11010248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Awareness of and compliance with recommended screening procedures: a comparison of HMO and fee-for-service enrollees.
    Luther SL; Steverson B; Studnicki J
    Manag Care Interface; 1999 Oct; 12(10):62-8. PubMed ID: 10623010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of satisfaction levels between traditional and managed care Medicare recipients.
    Roberts RA; Birch N
    J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1997; 20(1):105-24. PubMed ID: 10177349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In re HMO versus fee-for-service systems.
    Frank JM; Libow LS; Lesser GT
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2001 Mar; 49(3):334-5. PubMed ID: 11300247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What members want.
    Sachs MA; Pickens GT
    HMO; 1995; 36(2):21-4. PubMed ID: 10153114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of care of Medicare patients with diabetes in a metropolitan fee-for-service primary care integrated delivery system.
    Hollander P; Nicewander D; Couch C; Winter D; Herrin J; Haydar Z; Ballard DJ
    Am J Med Qual; 2005; 20(6):344-52. PubMed ID: 16280398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minnesota researchers find few differences in HMO, fee-for-service care of acute myocardial infarction.
    Miller JL
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1999 Nov; 56(22):2272. PubMed ID: 10582812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the structure of CAHPS measures among the medicare fee-for-service, medicare managed care, and privately insured populations.
    Bender RH; Garfinkel SA
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 11482586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.