These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7978525)

  • 1. Skeletal jaw relationships: a quantitative assessment using elliptical Fourier functions.
    Lowe BF; Phillips C; Lestrel PE; Fields HW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):299-308; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 7978525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.
    Dhopatkar A; Bhatia S; Rock P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Brezniak N; Arad A; Heller M; Dinbar A; Dinte A; Wasserstein A
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 12071609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion.
    Anderson DL; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 6579875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial morphology in children with Angle Class II-1 malocclusion with and without deepbite.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):437-46. PubMed ID: 7864465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes.
    Tahmina K; Tanaka E; Tanne K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 10842111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion.
    Innocenti C; Giuntini V; Defraia E; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 19361728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The normal range of horizontal jaw position in an adult female sample. A comparison with Class II data.
    Tourne LP; Michiels LY
    Int J Orthod; 1990; 28(3-4):8-12. PubMed ID: 2262300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sagittal spinal posture in relation to craniofacial morphology.
    Lippold C; Danesh G; Hoppe G; Drerup B; Hackenberg L
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):625-31. PubMed ID: 16808569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional differences in the craniofacial morphologies of groups with deep and shallow mandibular antegonial notching.
    Lambrechts AH; Harris AM; Rossouw PE; Stander I
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 8863961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types.
    Miralles R; Hevia R; Contreras L; Carvajal R; Bull R; Manns A
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 1763838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cranial base, sagittal jaw relationship and occlusion. A radiological-craniometric appraisal.
    Varjanne I; Koski K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1982; 78(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 7156124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class III malocclusion.
    Nartallo-Turley PE; Turley PK
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Jun; 68(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 9622758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample.
    Zhou L; Mok CW; Hägg U; McGrath C; Bendeus M; Wu J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18947277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of function regulator therapy using elliptical Fourier functions.
    Lestrel PE; Kerr WJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Dec; 15(6):481-91. PubMed ID: 8112414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.