These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7978918)

  • 1. The use of the donor oocyte program to evaluate embryo implantation.
    Check JH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Sep; 734():198-208. PubMed ID: 7978918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnancy rates in donors versus recipients according to the serum progesterone level at the time of human chorionic gonadotropin in a shared oocyte program.
    Check JH; Hourani C; Choe JK; Callan C; Adelson HG
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Feb; 61(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 8299780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.
    Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Fiszbajn G; Sueldo C; Hart RJ; Ciapponi A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jan; (1):CD006359. PubMed ID: 20091592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation does not adversely affect endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Levi AJ; Drews MR; Bergh PA; Miller BT; Scott RT
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Oct; 76(4):670-4. PubMed ID: 11591397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme.
    Check JH; O'Shaughnessy A; Lurie D; Fisher C; Adelson HG
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3022-7. PubMed ID: 8747065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of endometrial thickness and echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor oocyte-embryo transfer cycle.
    Check JH; Nowroozi K; Choe J; Lurie D; Dietterich C
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Jan; 59(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 8419225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation adversely affects implantation following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.
    Check JH; Choe JK; Katsoff D; Summers-Chase D; Wilson C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Sep; 16(8):416-20. PubMed ID: 10478320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Premature luteinization in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has no adverse effect on oocyte and embryo quality.
    Hofmann GE; Bentzien F; Bergh PA; Garrisi GJ; Williams MC; Guzman I; Navot D
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Oct; 60(4):675-9. PubMed ID: 8405524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fresh embryo transfer is more effective than frozen for donor oocyte recipients but not for donors.
    Check JH; Choe JK; Nazari A; Fox F; Swenson K
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1403-8. PubMed ID: 11425820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of triple line vs isoechogenic endometrial texture on pregnancy outcome following embryo transfer according to use of controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) or estrogen/progesterone replacement.
    Check JH; Dietterich C; Choe JK; Cohen R
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2013; 40(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 23724503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Endometrial preparation in oocyte recipients].
    Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Mayenga JM; Kulski O; Belaid Y; Grefenstette I; Belaisch-Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):507-10. PubMed ID: 22906698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer between the donors and the recipients in a donor oocyte program.
    Check JH; Nowroozi K; Chase J; Nazari A; Braithwaite C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1992 Jun; 9(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 1525455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipient-related determinants of success with donor eggs.
    Zenke U; Chetkowski RJ
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Oct; 82(4):850-6. PubMed ID: 15482759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Success of donor oocyte in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in recipients with and without premature ovarian failure.
    Lydic ML; Liu JH; Rebar RW; Thomas MA; Cedars MI
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 8557162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-homogeneous hyperechogenic echo pattern three days after frozen embryo transfer is associated with lower pregnancy rates.
    Check JH; Dietterich C; Nazari A; Lurie D; Choe JK; Check ML
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2005; 32(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 15864928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a shared donor oocyte program to evaluate the effect of uterine senescence.
    Check JH; Askari HA; Fisher C; Vanaman L
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Feb; 61(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 8299778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shared oocyte donation: society's benefits.
    Moomjy M; Mangieri R; Beltramone F; Cholst I; Veeck L; Rosenwaks Z
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Jun; 73(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 10856476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
    Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the importance of late follicular phase endometrial echo patterns and pregnancy outcome following embryo transfer by evaluating infertile donor/recipient pairs.
    Check JH; Choe JK; Amui J; Brasile D; Jamison T
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 38(4):318-9. PubMed ID: 22268261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.