These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7980330)

  • 1. A comparison of two contrast sensitivity tests and their usefulness as a screener for aircrew.
    McFadden SM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 Aug; 65(8):710-7. PubMed ID: 7980330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests for visual contrast sensitivity testing.
    Franco S; Silva AC; Carvalho AS; Macedo AS; Lira M
    Neurotoxicology; 2010 Dec; 31(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 20600292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual contrast sensitivity testing: a comparison of two F.A.C.T. test types.
    Hitchcock EM; Dick RB; Krieg EF
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 15019960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of neodymium: YAG capsulotomy on contrast sensitivity and the evaluation of methods for its assessment.
    Tan JC; Spalton DJ; Arden GB
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):703-9. PubMed ID: 10201590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods.
    Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study on core test characteristics of neuro-behavior in aircrew].
    Shen XY; Zhou FS; Hu SF; Zhang YP
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2002 Oct; 15(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 12449141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of the contrast sensitivity card test for infants: retest variability and prediction of spatial resolution.
    Drover JR; Courage ML; Dalton SM; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16614578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aircrew selection systems.
    Kantor JE; Carretta TR
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Nov; 59(11 Pt 2):A32-8. PubMed ID: 3202803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of cycloplegic effects on the vistech contrast sensitivity test in Army aviator candidates.
    Bachman WG; Egenmaier W
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 68(6):452-5. PubMed ID: 1891196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of mid-term stability of night vision tests.
    Levy Y; Glovinsky Y
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1997 Jul; 68(7):565-8. PubMed ID: 9215460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Jet pilot, helicopter pilot, and college student: a comparison of central vision.
    Temme LA; Still DL; Fatcheric AJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Apr; 66(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 7794219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast sensitivity: establishing normative data for use in screening prospective naval pilots.
    Grimson JM; Schallhorn SC; Kaupp SE
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Jan; 73(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11817617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cycloplegia on the visual contrast sensitivity function.
    Bachman WG; Behar I
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1987 Apr; 58(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 3579821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suprathreshold contrast matching in maculopathy.
    Mei M; Leat SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3419-24. PubMed ID: 17591917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aircrew visors and color vision performance: a comparative and preliminary pilot study analysis.
    Young PA; Perez-Becerra J; Ivan D
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1081-92. PubMed ID: 11086660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.