These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7982816)

  • 41. Phase-locked responses to pure tones in guinea pig auditory cortex.
    Wallace MN; Rutkowski RG; Shackleton TM; Palmer AR
    Neuroreport; 2000 Dec; 11(18):3989-93. PubMed ID: 11192615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-term suppression of the responses of auditory nerve fibers to a characteristic-frequency tone by a low-frequency suppressor.
    Cai Y; Geisler CD
    Hear Res; 1996 Jul; 96(1-2):141-50. PubMed ID: 8817313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Phase effects in forward masking of the compound action potential: a comparison of responses to stimulus and distortion frequencies.
    McAnally KI; Calford MB
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):110-8. PubMed ID: 8647713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transformation of temporal properties between auditory midbrain and cortex in the awake Mongolian gerbil.
    Ter-Mikaelian M; Sanes DH; Semple MN
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 27(23):6091-102. PubMed ID: 17553982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Differential frequency conditioning enhances spectral contrast sensitivity of units in auditory cortex (field Al) of the alert Mongolian gerbil.
    Ohl FW; Scheich H
    Eur J Neurosci; 1996 May; 8(5):1001-17. PubMed ID: 8743748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Intensity difference thresholds assessed with eighth nerve and auditory cortex potentials: compared values from cochlear and vascular responses.
    Cazals Y; Aran JM; Erre JP
    Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 10(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 6874599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Spontaneous rates, thresholds and tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in the gerbil: comparisons to cat data.
    Schmiedt RA
    Hear Res; 1989 Oct; 42(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 2584157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of low-frequency biasing on auditory-nerve activity.
    Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 7108036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Forward masking of the compound action potential: thresholds for the detection of the N1 peak.
    Relkin EM; Smith RL
    Hear Res; 1991 May; 53(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 2066281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression?
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Cecola RP; Jackson DF; Szabo P
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):40-50. PubMed ID: 8458758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Electrically induced potentiation of eighth nerve responses.
    Ball LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):107-30. PubMed ID: 7187432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Derived guinea pig compound VIIIth nerve action potentials to continuous pure tones.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Barlow EK; Morehouse CR; Smith EG
    Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 52(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 2061218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts.
    Shore SE; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1286-95. PubMed ID: 3840500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Auditory neural activity evoked by pure-tone stimulation as a function of intensity.
    Ryan AF; Braverman S; Woolf NK; Axelsson GA
    Brain Res; 1989 Apr; 483(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 2706521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF.
    Guinan JJ; Gifford ML
    Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 37(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 3225230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Action potentials in the cat at low sound intensities: thresholds, latencies, and rates of change.
    Price GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Nov; 64(5):1400-5. PubMed ID: 744840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Compound action potential input/output functions in young and quiet-aged gerbils.
    Hellstrom LI; Schmiedt RA
    Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):163-74. PubMed ID: 2076969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of excitatory and non-excitatory suppressor tones on two-tone rate suppression in auditory nerve fibers.
    Costalupes JA; Rich NC; Ruggero MA
    Hear Res; 1987; 26(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 3570993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound.
    Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 38(1-2):47-56. PubMed ID: 2708159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.